Do you think US troops should be fighting in Iraqi civil war or going after Bin Laden & his new terror camps..

Question

in Pakistan?

Answer 1

Bin Laden has no connection with Iraq. In Iraq the issue is sectarian and people of Iraq have to resolve this issue for the sake of national unity. A strong security force consisting of people of Iraq is necessity. As for your reference to Pakistan, we are victims of terrorism. Pakistan is front line partner of war against terrorism. No power on earth can block its porous borders. We have decided to use mines not to allow crossing of borders. This is subject of an experienced general to judge. To understand the thinking of Afghan people, please go to following web page.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/05/opinion/05may.html

Answer 2

Well we know Iraq is unstable and Bin Laden is probably in Pakistan. Unfortunately Pakistan is not just going to let us send in 200,000 troops in to their country. They have national sovereignty that we have to respect. We could tell them to crack down on tribes that support the Taliban in that volatile region by the Afghan border.
The real problem is that the Prime Minister of Pakistan is hiding under his desk and not doing anything. People are wondering why the Taliban is getting a foot hold in Afghanistan, and people like you who do not know what they are talking about are saying that it is because we diverted troops to Iraq. BS!!!! The reason that the Taliban is getting a foot hold in Afghanistan is because they are getting sheltered in Pakistan by radical tribes. They can get supplies and get more soldiers and get rearmed. Now to Iraq. You could say that there is a civil war going on there, but thats the
biased media interpretation. yes Sunnis and Shiites are killing each other but to call it a civil war is irresponsible. If it was a civil war thousands of Iraqis would be killed each day when less than 100 are killed each day. Also yes our soldiers should be fighting in your "civil war" because it is in our deep interests. How you ask? Simple. If the radical Shiites get control Iran will have control of Iraq. Making it another country to ship weapons to Hezbollah so they can attack Israel. Also note that Iran wants to have power of the WHOLE MIDDLE EAST. If the radical Sunnis led by Al-Qaida get control of Iraq it is simple: Al-Qaida LED BY BIN LADEN will have control of Iraq.

Go back to the 1st grade and stop spewing false trash about a subject you don't know **** about.

Answer 3

Bin laden? Who's that? Oh yeah, the guy responsible for the attack on this country. We should only go after him if he has imaginary weapons of mass destruction or has called someone's father a name or threatened him. We should stay in viet nam, my bad, Iraq, until are military is entirely on arab soil leaving this country open for another attack or until our military is depleted down to allow the draft to be reinstated. Sound like a plan? It's worked so far.

Answer 4

I think by fighting in Iraq, sooner or later we will find
Bin Laden (if he's still alive)> We haven't seen any
videos from him for quite a while now. We sure don't
want to let him or his kind take over all the middle east,
and then come target US.

Answer 5

a civil war can only really be fougt by people within the country. i would move the troops to afghanistan

Answer 6

We are helping Iraq to help themselves at this time and we are going after UBL at the same time!


==============================

Answer 7

we should be in eastern europe trying to fight for more chicken so i can get my chicken fingers on over at applebees

Answer 8

neither... how about stopping Israel from encroaching on other people's territory.