Hillary's cold hearted ruthless thirst for power or Obama's narrow, unenlightened experience on the National level and/ or even a remote understanding of the Geopolitical scene?
2007-02-28 12:57:38 · 21 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I can't believe I'm saying this, but Obama is worse. He is too inexperienced. Hillary, on the other hand, won't do a thing without taking a poll.
2007-02-28 13:01:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think you sound a bit ignorant when you say that, but your opinions are your opinions..
I think Hillary would make a good president, she has the experience and confidence, she knows how the white house works. I don't see the cold hearted ruthless part, maybe you could've provided an example?? Obama doesn't have a lot of experience, true.. but Bush was governor of Texas for what, one and a half terms? And Texas is known for a state government that gives little power to its governor. Plus our country has had many "inexperienced" leader who have done a great job, the experienced ones are the bad ones, ala Nixon. Maybe a President that isn't encumbered by political baggage would be good for the country? And one who is liked by the international community, because from what i have viewed i think Kim Jon Ill is more popular overseas than Bush is..
2007-02-28 21:14:28 · answer #2 · answered by tim c 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd take the anti-beltway neophyte Obama over the radical, special interest loving Hilary any day. And most US Presidents aren't Geopolitical specialists. Reagan didn't have a clue about foreign policy until he got into office and had some fantastic foreign policy advisers which I'm sure Obama will have if he becomes President.
2007-02-28 21:05:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are both informed and it's exciting to see this intelligent forward thinking woman in her quest and this first Black persons equally provocative and calmly instructive suggestions towards an America capable of commanding respect, dignity and authority in a war torn disease filled environmentally failing world. They are the first pure light we have seen!!
2007-02-28 21:05:46 · answer #4 · answered by Faerie loue 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but I think Obama's cool.
I agree with you about Hillary, but Obama's cool.
He's the only one interviewing for the job instead of mudslinging.
I'm ready to hire him right now.
2007-02-28 21:01:49 · answer #5 · answered by jam_please 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NOTHING can be worse than the current incumbent.
A bit of advice, try to get used to the idea of Hillary as President, the shock will possibly kill you otherwise.
2007-02-28 21:03:16 · answer #6 · answered by Tokoloshimani 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
obama is worse. hes only been in the senate 2 years and doesnt know much about politics. i dont think he could run our country. at least hilary has experience since she always helped her husband during his presidency. i dont really like her either but i think she'd do a much better job than obama.
2007-02-28 21:01:45 · answer #7 · answered by megan_mcha 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
both...they will ended up on the same ticket sooner or later...if illary doesnt get the nomination she will never be able to run again..time is a ticking..if Obama gets it ..he will offer her the vp spot..and I hope he doesnt end up like Vince Foster...and if she gets it she will offer vp to him as the token canidate..either way America will be in trouble..
2007-02-28 21:02:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama's lack of being influenced by the corrupt powers that be (lobbyists) in Washington, make him even more favorable...don't you see that?
2007-02-28 21:02:42 · answer #9 · answered by dstr 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is Obama a flip flopper?
2007-02-28 21:04:26 · answer #10 · answered by David D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋