Every day I always see something that makes fun of bush like those adds and stuff and his failure of the war. Was Clinton was in office, was it the same for him too?
2007-02-28 12:26:59 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
hmm.. probably not lol! I mean, Clinton did shock America with his perverse shenanigans, but overall, he was an okay leader. I personally think Bush deals with more criticism because he has made SOO many bogus decisions. Sure, he's got his morals, but overall he's the crappiest leader America has ever seen. Most of his support has been lost. I cant wait to kick him out! I'm finally old enough to vote ^_^
2007-02-28 12:33:53 · answer #1 · answered by Laura 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
NO, NO, NO, NO! Bush has been rediculed, and hated, much more than President Clinton. Republicans in general are hated much more than Democrats. Atleast it seems that way. I know Republicans, particularly the Christian right, have plenty of hatred for Democrats, but the Democrats are much more vocal about it than Republicans.
This is why I'm no longer a Democrat. I'm now officially an Independent. So long Democratic Party. I hope you don't miss me, cause I most certainly won't miss you.
2007-02-28 20:51:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not as much. Half of the country did not care. This impeachment movement was mostly the effort of right wing Republicans. As for Bush, His base of support is far smaller, he administration's policies are less intelligent, and certainly less than effective.
2007-02-28 21:01:26 · answer #3 · answered by planksheer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah, talk radio was born as an answer to Bill Clinton, matter of fact if you listen in to Rush he devotes a segment to him or Hillary every day. Where do you think that most of the neo-cons here get their idea's from. Not from free thinking that is for sure.
2007-02-28 20:33:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It was the same but not for long.Not even close .There is a big difference in the 2 I think.I think that Clinton was better at least there wasn't war there was love lol...no pun attended lol...have a wonderful wk.
2007-02-28 20:31:57 · answer #5 · answered by too4barbie 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Clinton was criticized as much as Bush just for different reasons.
2007-02-28 20:35:19 · answer #6 · answered by Jim C 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
well... every president is criticized... but Bush has been a lot... and Clinton was a lot... not sure which is more...
maybe Bush... but I think Bush has also had a lot more bad policy overall than Clinton did...
2007-02-28 20:32:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yep, every single day of his career, and probably by a lot of the same people doing it to Bush. They just love the bash.
2007-02-28 20:31:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, most Americans adored him. He was a good president. We lived well under his administration.
He was hounded a lot during the time Repugs were jealous of his sexual prowess was he criticized a lot. No significant criticism for the way he ran the country.
2007-02-28 20:30:33 · answer #9 · answered by nemesis 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Are you kidding!!! People still bring up crap about him daily on this site. We were in a good economic time and had no war. Things were good.
2007-02-28 20:31:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋