2007-02-28 11:57:05 · 19 answers · asked by Josh A 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
HITLER!
Well at least he has had the decency to put us out of his misery (kill himself) Bush and Blair still seem quite happy tormenting us all.
2007-02-28 12:09:15 · answer #1 · answered by tigger_pooh_on_you 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You know, if they reintroduced Civics Class into the public school curriculum, you would never post such a stupid question.
Luckily, Liberalism is something people tend to grow out of. At 15, you may think wearing baggy jeans and skateboarder clothes is really great, but at 25 you realize it's pretty dopey.
As Winston Churchill said, "If at 20 you're not a Liberal, you don't have a heart. But if at 40 you're not a Conservative, you don't have a brain".
We should thank our lucky stars for tough, resolute statesmen like PM Tony Blair and President Bush who don't pander to the Lowest Common Denominator.
2007-02-28 12:02:56 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hitler. I'm Black but I still idolise him. I hate him deep down and hate Germans, but for years I've always seen myself as Hitler and I even have friends salute me and chant his name every time they see me. But at the same time, I love Idi Amin. Including, Pol Pot, Joseph Stalin, Nero, Caligula, Atilla The Hun, Ivan The Terrible, Vlad The Impaler, Grigori Rasputin and Francisco Pizarro.
2007-02-28 20:43:51 · answer #3 · answered by Micheal 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
George Bush Of course!
2007-02-28 12:05:43 · answer #4 · answered by dottygoatbeagle 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Id say Hitler...he wasnt exactly"Lovable",but at least you knew where you stood with the Fuhrer,and im sure he wouldnt have put up with those muslim terrorists...Hitler wasnt the sort of man to be messed about,he was a real dictator,not like Saddam or the pathetic Taliban....
2007-02-28 12:20:39 · answer #5 · answered by stef8705 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If I had no choice (like someone was holding me at gunpoint) but to choose I would go for Tony Blair because he did not start the war I know he went along with it but did not start it but I don't love him and as far as i'm concerned they can all go and top themselves
2007-02-28 12:01:53 · answer #6 · answered by friendofb 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Definitely Idi Amein his name is the most entertaining to say
2007-02-28 12:00:57 · answer #7 · answered by sharpie 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'd have to say that Cheney has them all beat. And Chime_right_in is quite correct to link God with that crowd noting all the damage that religion has done throughout history.
2007-02-28 12:00:54 · answer #8 · answered by AZ123 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is been shown previous any doubt, that Iraq administration replaced into FINANCING terrorism by their oil salary. some traced to Ben encumbered and different terrorist agencies. Any united states that helps the killing of electorate, even of their own territories, as Iraq did, actual replaced into component of the photo of terror. for the duration of any of our international wars, a united states might want to declare conflict on any they chanced on helping their enemy! In our day and age, it truly is actual some Muslims who advise that anybody it truly is no longer of their faith might want to die. there is also data that Iran is and has been helping terrorism by funds or perhaps some Liberals reported searching after that project! it truly is brilliant as maximum Liberals are hostile to any Republican President on any conflict situation! They make all a play for a vote and for politics no remember if the country or our human beings will wade through for it. lets advise that they don't seem even American for some! So we received't call Bush a terrorists at the same time as he's attempting to end it.. We might want to undergo in options, it truly is international and many international locations have suffered from murders and kidnappings from those animals...Earl
2016-10-17 09:34:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blair, off the" facts of life"
2007-02-28 12:01:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋