2007-02-28 11:14:05 · 8 answers · asked by Harriet 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes, why do you ask?
2007-02-28 11:35:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but neither are the Blair goverment so what can we hope for the MOD as they are controlled by the goverment. We need new MP's and new faces with new ideas and it would be nice if these people could be honest for a change.
2007-02-28 14:44:17 · answer #2 · answered by Closed Down 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but here's the cut. We don't need to be ready we can build an armed force relatively quickly if needed. Why spend money on a massive standing army.
2007-02-28 20:47:12 · answer #3 · answered by Ian L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The MOD is only as effective as it's political masters allow it to be.
2007-02-28 18:51:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great staff.
Poor equipment
Dire government.
In a word, no - and the government are to blame. Period.
Lions led by a donkey (Blair) although it is fairer to point the finger at Hoon.
2007-02-28 11:19:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the 1s that do the grafting yes best in the world but the high racki are f**king usless all they are bothered about is cutting costs except paying the wages of these high racki usless sh*ts
2007-02-28 11:41:53 · answer #6 · answered by shaun w 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends what their purpose is. they're not doing much defending in my opinion.. the MOWar would be a more fitting title i feel x
2007-02-28 11:18:03 · answer #7 · answered by aria 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should rename it MOA.
2007-02-28 11:19:23 · answer #8 · answered by Joe Bloggs 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋