what are some arguments for/against Socrates claim: "No evil can happen to a good man"?

Question

and what about his claim that people only do evil out of ignorance?

Answer 1

Sort of like "When life gives you lemons, make lemon aide?" A "good" man will take a bad circumstance and make it turn out for the good? I hardly think that works for tragedies or disasters. Maybe the "good" man is so Stoic he doesn't notice or feel the evil? In that case, did Socrates notice the hemlock? He noticed it enough to die from it. Perhaps he wasn't "good" enough to live on? Just some thoughts for your homework assignment.

Answer 2

Evil can of course happen to a good man when events outside his power or influence conspire against him. Atrocities have taken place in the world, well documented by historians, that harmed good people.
As to people only commit evil out of ignorance...that is plausible but now wholly true. Most people may do evil deed out of ignorance of anything better. Some however, may commit evils in full knowledge of all (most) factors that are involved.

Answer 3

the confusion is interior the interest 'evil' and what Socrates has in strategies here. it is unquestionably style of a slogan in greek philosophy. it would not advise that unfair and undesirable issues do not take place to good human beings interior the way we oftentimes think of of them, what he potential is that for an outstanding individual, not something can take place to them to lead them to do evil willingly. an outstanding guy is one that totally fulfills the function of reason, with the purpose to make an outstanding guy undesirable may well be tantamount to creating them bypass against their universal function and willingly spoil themselves. Socrates declare is that no evil that befalls an stunning guy could make that guy be much less good (or evil).

Answer 4

9/11

Answer 5

the book of Job.