2007-02-28 09:56:22 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
Hilary Clinton
2007-02-28 10:03:34 · answer #1 · answered by VagisilWipes 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Which person was President during the War?
That would be FDR and Truman after FDR died.
Which President served in the military during World War II?
There were many. Nixon, Bush (the first one), Eisenhower, Kennedy and Regan.
2007-02-28 10:06:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Both of this president service during WW2 (1941 - 1945)
The beginning of the war was Franklin D Roosevelt and just at the end of the war was Harry Truman
2007-02-28 10:24:38 · answer #3 · answered by njnowell 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
FDR served for much of the time, during 4 terms, the only President to do so. Truman finished out FDR's last term when the war was pretty much over.
2007-02-28 10:00:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Two of them: Franklin D Roosevelt during the beginning of the war (1941-1945) and Harry Truman at the end (1945).
2007-02-28 10:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by Ben H 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The President for most of World War II was F.D.R. (Franklin Delano Roosevelt). When F.D.R. died during his fourth term, he was replaced by his vice president, Harry Truman, who decided to throw the atomic bomb on Japan.
2007-02-28 10:06:09 · answer #6 · answered by swimming_dramastar19 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Franklin Delano Roosevelt and then Harry Truman
2007-02-28 10:07:17 · answer #7 · answered by tx_heathervest 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
ok, perhaps on some point i'm getting what you recommend....You hate conflict. Cool, so do I . So does each and every favourite guy or woman. we could quite be allowed to accomplish our day by day lives. no one fancies seeing their acquaintances and kinfolk die one-by skill of-one. yet such as you stated- it replaced into 1941. It replaced into BANG interior the direction of THE conflict between the Allies and the Axis powers. And mutually as anybody is familiar with that peace talks could have been a greater advantageous option, it wasn't even an option back then. yet right here is the element- your u . s .'s in risk. it fairly is basically been attacked-viciously so. i don't be responsive to roughly you, yet i could do each and everything i could desire to to guard it. no one had to combat with no reason. It replaced into actually "kill or be killed". And no one- after seeing fellow electorate being slaughtered like that- could desire to easily stand by skill of. So yeah, peace is great- it fairly is the appropriate way out. i admire your morals concerning to that, and that they are important in the time of those circumstances. yet conflict-time is distinctive, that's what you have have been given to comprehend... no one's going to stand by skill of and don't something. Logically conversing, you in all hazard does no longer have been shot.a minimum of no longer instantaneous,nevertheless you might have been charged with desertion...yet no less than, it may be the unpatriotic element to do in a difficulty like that,does no longer it? :) basically my opinion....and curiously the comparable with many others right here.
2016-09-30 00:51:52 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think FDR but i could be totally wrong
2007-02-28 10:00:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
jimmy carter and george bush..and JFK...and eisenhour
2007-02-28 10:04:24 · answer #10 · answered by italianone70 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋