2007-02-28 08:52:47 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I dont know. It does seem a bit perverted to fancy him, seeing how Ive practically watched him growing up in the Harry Potter films, but when I saw those pictures of him in Equus, OH MY GOD! Im old enough to know better aswell!
2007-03-01 04:47:05 · answer #1 · answered by fallenangel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well "Harry Potter' isnt as the west end naked, Daniel is. So its really a question of whether you fancy Harry Potter the character or Daniel Radcliffe the person ??? I personally think its fantastic to fancy both, 'Harry Potter' for his amazing story and courage and 'Daniel Radcliffe' for being such a fabulous actor, and challenging himeself for taking such a risk, not to mention being absolutely gorgeous.
2007-02-28 17:32:15 · answer #2 · answered by hippiejane 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's not wrong to fancy Daniel Radcliffe he's not a child. Plus, what difference does it make if he decided to do a play like Equus? It's only uptight prudes that will have a problem with it. And as to those people that think he should be more responsible because of his fans - sorry but it's not his job to bring your kids or to be a good role model - it's a play - get over it. He's a good looking young man, nothing wrong with that.
2007-03-01 05:03:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is a good performance by him and his supporting actors/actress.
Getting rid of the image of Harry Potter will enable him to go and and not be type cast.
Watching him act he looses all the connections to what has made him famous.
May he continue stretching his abilities, as for being naked nothing new he looks good.
2007-03-01 12:17:40 · answer #4 · answered by rachelsweet2001 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not wrong to fancy him. He's human and of age so I reckon that's ok.
I'm wondering if he wants the sack from being Harry though. He's not doing anything wrong of course but the newest pictures of him showing him writhing about naked ontop of a naked girl in the play aren't exactly Hogwarts friendly stuff.
2007-02-28 18:24:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Seeing Harry Potter naked? That' damn hot. On the overhand.. How would I ever be able to watch another Harry Potter Movie again?..
2007-02-28 17:40:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
For the last bloody time (cause I'm getting bored with explaining this to people fifteen times a day at work...). He's NOT Harry Potter, he is Daniel Radcliffe. He is an actor - a bloody good one -and if you fancy him, then go with it (unless your, like, 40 or something. That'd be too creepy). You're not the first and you sure as hell won't be the last.
2007-02-28 17:33:46 · answer #7 · answered by Tish P 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I know you put Harry Potter in quotation marks but please, if your referring to him in anything that isn't Harry Potter, call him Daniel!! Also, I don't think it is. I have seen the pictures. And let me tell you, he's so much hotter there[[even with his clothes on]] than in the 5th Harry Potter movie[[which I can't wait to see]], If you don't believe me, google image search them. Then tell me what you think!
PCE ~ Amber
2007-02-28 23:18:30 · answer #8 · answered by Amber 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tish, she clearly put quote marks around 'Harry Potter' to indicate that she knows he is not Harry Potter. Stop being such an insufferable know-it-all. The people at your work must be truly sick of you.
2007-02-28 17:44:06 · answer #9 · answered by The Wrong Girl 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No its not. I'm still a fan of Daniel even though of his role in EQUUS. I know hes just doing whats best for his career. Hey you gotta take chances to get where you want to be and thats what he did.
2007-02-28 17:02:23 · answer #10 · answered by . 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋