English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

got naked on stage for 4 minutes yesterday.... starring in a play about a boy who has erotic feelings towards horses.. yes you heard me right.. was this a good step for the young star or abit weird?

plus hes only 17 should he really be gettin naked in front of an audience isnt that like a bit weird?

2007-02-28 08:39:13 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

18 answers

Equus is a fascinating story. Try reading it.
Daniel Radcliffe is just being an actor branching out and doing new stuff. So he gets naked. So what. It's not porn he's doing.
You see young girls as young as 14 and 15 on catwalks modelling very revealing clothes, and no-one bats an eyelid.

The sad thing is that the theatre has taken over £1 million of advanced bookings, just because people want to see him naked.

2007-02-28 08:56:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is indeed a very good step for the young star because he now won't be typecast as Harry Potter. He's not the greatest actor but he's putting bums on seats in the theatre and reputedly earning £40,000 a week. The nakedness is a fundamental part of the play.

2007-02-28 18:13:33 · answer #2 · answered by georgeygirl 5 · 0 0

He mutilates the horses in the play blinding 4 of them. It is a brave step for an actor to take but at the end of the day he is an actor and he wants to establish himself as a little bit more than just being harry potter.

2007-02-28 08:48:35 · answer #3 · answered by chris_morganuk 3 · 0 0

I agree, i'm 15 but i think he is too young to strip. I like the Harry Potter films but the new play was wierd, it was so not Daniel!

2007-02-28 08:44:58 · answer #4 · answered by Want Your Bad Romance 4 · 0 0

I think it's good for him to go out and experience and try other things...
but what he's doing is crazy. Especially for 17 years old. I don't think he should be naked in front of the whole world.

2007-02-28 08:43:43 · answer #5 · answered by julieee. 4 · 1 0

hes' an actor, if it wasnt' him it would have been some other 17 yr old, the fuss is because he has been in HP, and he needs to branch away from that and prove he can be other characters or it would become a chain round his neck

2007-02-28 08:43:17 · answer #6 · answered by redsticks34 3 · 3 0

this isn't new news, the advertisment pictures showing him nude for the play is all over the internet. over there in england the age for being a minor is different too. also, this is a play not a porno flick anyway.

2007-02-28 08:43:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

liking horses in that way.................. is a bit weird and normally i thing that would damage a persons career but since he did the harry potter films i don't think it would matter

2007-02-28 08:47:34 · answer #8 · answered by Patrick 2 · 0 0

ARE YOU SERIOUS?! wooooow, i'm gonna have to look this up. haha
i honestly cant picture him doing that! then again, i'm thinking of him as harry potter so i guess i cant say anything.

2007-02-28 08:43:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

he was probably getting paid a lot to do it and he was only naked on the top half

2007-02-28 08:42:56 · answer #10 · answered by friendofb 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers