No I would not mind if the stock didn't pay a dividend if it was received well by the marketplace & its management had the company moving in the right direction.
If the company doesn't pay a dividend i would hope that they are wisely re-investing those funds into better corporate operations.
2007-02-28 08:36:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ronatnyu 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
As long as the stock price grows +6 to 10% per year, I don't need a dividend.
2007-02-28 16:44:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If one believes the company is selling at a good price, that the company's fundamentals are excellent, and that it’s earnings are growing rapidly, a non-dividend paying stock can (still) make a great investment.
2007-02-28 16:35:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bayou Brigadier 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sure! some of my stocks that don't pay a dividend are my best performers.
2007-02-28 16:32:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by SimpleMan 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I pick a company well that doesn't give dividends, then that is fine because the interest should be good anyway.
2007-02-28 18:22:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by zander1331 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dividends are typically paid by larger, stable, slow growth or cyclical companies. Smaller and fast growing companies typically re-invest profits into the business to grow it and make even bigger profits in the future.
There's a place for both in most investor's portfolios.
2007-02-28 18:17:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tim S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋