I'd take the billions because all that money would enable me to save countless thousands of children in third world countries who are dying simply because they don't have food to eat and water to drink...Nothing against the one child with cancer, but I'd rather go with the choice that'll have a bigger impact.
2007-02-28 07:35:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by sarge927 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry, but I'd take the billions and try to save many little kids life. Imagine the good you could do with Billions of dollars.
2007-02-28 07:36:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"existence, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is barely for wealthy young little ones. For undesirable young little ones there are in basic terms duties. undesirable young little ones enlist at a plenty larger fee than wealthy young little ones. Recruiters objective them because of the fact they be responsive to they have not any desire of having a stable activity after severe college. they are confident by utilising the (fake) claims that armed forces education transfers into civilian activity marketability, that's would not. because of the Bush administration pay and reward restructuring, enlisted workers can now no longer help their households. wealthy young little ones do no longer enlist, they take their levels and commence out in the officer track. ?°)
2016-10-02 03:07:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well since i have never had any money....... and i like my life the way it is i would rather save a little kids life who had cancer soooo that they would be able to enjoy life just as much as i do....
cancer is a horrible disease to deal with and all the money in the world is not worth watching some one suffer with it.....
i watched my dad go through it........
2007-02-28 07:34:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by lynnepeterpan 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd rather be super rich because I have no idea what canser is.
2007-02-28 07:38:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by mantle two 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I choose rich - then I can donate a bunch of money for pediatirc cancer
2007-02-28 07:30:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tiger by the Tail 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Canser was cured years ago,, Cancer on the other hand.......
2007-02-28 13:28:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would cure the kid with cancer, because if I could cure cancer I would be a billionaire anyway
2007-03-01 07:34:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by frosty62 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would save a kids LIFE
2007-02-28 07:34:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by zwack 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Show me billions, I'll get you the cure.
2007-02-28 07:40:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by 6kidsANDalwaysFIXINGsomething 4
·
0⤊
0⤋