Facts about MLK:
- Plaigerized his doctoral thesis
- Had extramarital affairs with white women
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King_Jr.
Why does Yahoo delete me when this is discussed?
2007-02-28 06:49:02 · 10 answers · asked by Erwin F 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Well, some people will claim that you are racist for questioning the life of Martin Luther King Jr.
When someone passionately disagrees with your question, they are usually inclined to find someway to get rid of it. Yahoo has given them that option by claiming you are violating the rules somehow. It is actually those people who are having your questions removed. I do not think that Yahoo has people watching the questions and deleting the ones they find offensive. I think that Yahoo is relying on the people on Yahoo Answers to police themselves. That does lend it self to abuse, however.
Next time, instead of just providing a link to a wiki, write down the evidence that is here and provide a link to a more reliable site to back it up. Wiki is not considered the best site to quote because it can be altered by anyone (on most the pages that is). It is a great place to start your research though.
2007-02-28 06:54:53 · answer #1 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are probably being reported a bunch of tI'mes I don't think yahoo actually checks the reports just deletes the questions and sends violations. It's somewhat of an inflammatory subject im sure some people are offended by it who knows
2007-02-28 07:00:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps because people keep reporting you for abuse. Learn to spell "plagiarize," BTW. Otherwise people might mistake you for an ignorant, rednecked, bigoted troll. Oh, wait...
Speaking of MLK: what was he doing between the "I have a dream" speech in 1963 and his death in 1968, and why doesn't anyone talk about it? Hmmmm....
2007-02-28 06:56:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If YA overtly condones pedophilia, will it substitute into the Vatican's abode website? yet in all seriousness, those web content you mentioned (fb, YouTube) weren't banned because of the fact human beings "uncovered the reality approximately Islam." i think of asserting it fairly is in basic terms plan retarded, once you somewhat think of roughly it, pondering the "actuality" of Islam isn't very different from the "actuality" or center teachings of maximum religions. They have been banned because of the fact of non secular ideals, in view that those websites had too many references to alcohol, intercourse, playing, etc. All issues strictly against their ideals. of direction, it fairly is fairly undemanding to easily declare that i'm incorrect, and fronting for them. have faith even though the hell you like. all of us comprehend that it is not a actual question, it fairly is in basic terms something to incite reactions.
2016-10-16 23:08:03 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because you are using wikipedia as a source, and pretty much anyone with a half way decent education can tell you that wikipedia is a bad source! So, stop using it, and wise up because anyone can put anything on wikipedia!
2007-02-28 06:54:07 · answer #5 · answered by Laura 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You can only be critical of white Christians on Y/A. The feelings of white Christians don't matter to the Y/A gods.
2007-02-28 06:54:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Probably HOW you're saying it. I have a question, though: why do you have this burning desire to "expose the truth" about someone who's been dead longer than he was alive and whose only apparant contribution to society was declaring in a loud annoying voice that "I have a dream" . that's ALL we ever hear of this supposed infamous speech--really who gives a flying rats a**! I suggest finding someone more current & frankly relative to the 21st century--let's move on for christ sake.
2007-02-28 07:01:56 · answer #7 · answered by Clycs 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I don't believe u and think all this stuff u are saying are lies.
2007-02-28 06:54:28 · answer #8 · answered by missgigglebunny 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
and why others' faults can be discussed but not his ?
2007-02-28 06:54:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
do you discuss other's faults?
if not, why?
2007-02-28 06:51:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋