Are bush-supporters aware that the Bush admin. has seen less net gain economically than other administrations?

Question

Look at what the people of DowJones itself has to say:

http://djindexes.com/mdsidx/index.cfm?event=showavgDecades&decade=2000

Nope, the Clinton-years were a time of prosperity. We had HUGE gains.

There was no way that the Bush administration knew nothing about the dangers of Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden when they took office.
You're right. 9/11 impacted our economy horribly.

Answer 1

Yes, and we also realize the complications to the economy during the administration the chief example being 9/11.

You do realize the mini-crash in 2000 was a direct result of Clinton's economic policies and that the economy hadn't fully recovered from that before being hit with the terrorist attacks on 9/11.

There are many factors that affect how the market and the economy performs including influences from outside the US that our presidents past, current, and future have no control over, so I would say trying to blame this one on President Bush is a bust.


I notice that the Bush-bashers don't like to hear the truth. That is really too bad.

1. We had a huge economic bubble that burst before Clinton left office.

Answer 2

The problems that lead to 911 were started under the CLINTON administration. Bush had not been in an office even a year. Well said Christina.

Answer 3

Bush supporters don't understand what 'net' means.
You'll need to draw a picture, preferable with somebody holding a gun.

Answer 4

less gain is better than Bubble-Clinton loss, am I right?