So as per you Neena Gupta ans Sushmita Sen are happy living single? Dnt forget that they are into glamour world where relationship holds very less ratio. A woman however qualified is not seen with respectful eyes by the soceity if she is single, let her be of good character still people will throw stones on her. At one point of time she feels lonely when youth fades off, she too craves for touch and warmth of her close ones. She can live, it is not impossible but an incomplete life.
2007-02-28 21:27:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by jana s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
even after one is well educated and financially sound and is able to live alone WE ARE STILL IN INDIA.
life style is totally different in the west and each girl is not Susmita Sen.
marriage is a institution developed by mankind for its benefit,security,pleasure and love.we can not live like animals in the jungle,we all are dependent on each other and society in one way or other.
in the western world everyone receives a minimum basic salary or unemployment pay.then all working people get at least 60% pension of the last drawn salary which is more than sufficient to support retirement.then there are excellent old homes for those who have no one.this is possible because all people pay all taxes honestly.then there is less population to consider.
ponder on above conditions.do we have this in our India?
lastly people in the west do respect privacy and individualism but don't think good of a girl who is living alone,without marriage,adopting a child or raring a bastard.
2007-02-28 17:40:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by rajan t 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Marriage is not a need. It is loving someone, spending and sharing your life with them. It is having children together, making memories, cuddling up with some at the end of the day who will be there till your old and gray. I am happily married and to tell you the truth I am happier then I was when I was single. It is nice having a family and marriage does work. Bad things always get more publicity and talked about more then the good. I really hope you find someone like I did and give it a chance.
2007-02-28 06:34:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ann 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The difference with you not wanting marriage, but would like to adopt a child, you will be raising the child without the child having a father figure in his/her life. You must be against 'men' for some reason, don't know what it is. But, that is your choice.
It is not that the marriage system isn't working, it is the people who are married to each other don't make it work. Don't label it the 'marriage system', it should be labeled as 'husband & wife'.
The reason why today some marriages don't work is because couples are not willing to make it work. They are not willing to fix the problems that go on with their families, etc....so they look for an easy way out by leaving and by getting a divorce. When a couple gets married they become as one and have made vows to each other, but many, many couples do break their contract with one another, and the contract that they made with God.
So, don't compare the 'not working' marriages with other marriages who are busting their butts to make their marriages work and to do what ever it takes to fix the problems and keep their families together. Marriages like that, stay together.
2007-02-28 06:31:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
That's your ego talking.
Women don't marry for financial aids, and men don't marry because they want someone to cook and wash for them. They marry because for the need of intimate companionship.
While giving the examples of nena gupta and sushmita sen, did you realize that neena gupta reequired a man for that purpose, and sushimta sen adopted children not because she hates guys but because she wanted to do something for orphans. She is the leading example for all people around the world. She could not adopt all of them, but she adopted two, a live example that humnaity prevails. And people like you compare it with egoistic views.
Look into yourself before you raise questions at others. You talk about a man's ego, while your ego has already come into play with your views. God created man and woman with different set of capabilities so that they can take care of his creations and develop themselves through each others co-operation. But people like you (both men and women) who think that they should just be able to manage themselves, that's it' have created imbalance in the harmonic rythm of the society.
Better learn some lessons before it's too late. All the best...
:-)
2007-03-01 03:18:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by plato's ghost 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you have got it all messed up in your mind. First of all the percentage of marriages failing is very less than that projected in the media. secondly you cannot blame the institution of marriage for the failure since most of the time its the individuals who are responsible for it. Beeing financially sound and well educated should help in a marriages rather than break it cos most of the marriages fail either because of financial problems or lack of understanding. I fail to understand why does individuality of a woman becomes an issue when it comes to marriage. There are millions of married women who have made a niche for themselves in society without disturbing their institution of marriages. and lastly if all women start thinking on your lines then whole of mankind will be in threat. A woman working or otherwise, has a far more greater roll to play than a man.
2007-02-28 18:55:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by SPEEDO 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Seriously, this is not a question, this is your opinion man. And adoption isn't the same as having your own child and experiencing child birth. From what i understand Child Birth is a miracle in its own (except the pain and getting up all night). And females like the feeling of having someone there to help them make it through this thing we call life. You will too if, this is about you?
2007-02-28 06:18:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you feel you can live your entire life without a companion, go for it. Keep in mind it is more difficult to adopt a child as a single woman then it is as a married couple. Also keep in mind if you should happen to lose your job or become handicapped and unable to work, you will have no way to support the child without a husbands income. But hey, its your life, do what you want with it, just dont complain to us in 20 years when you are so lonely.
2007-02-28 06:12:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kevin J 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Gee I always thought that the purpose of marriage was to declare an intention to stick with your partner through thick and thin, I dunno a promise of love for the future, yknow since we are social beings and since love, although never perfect, is wonderful thing unequalled by anything else. The financial stability is another reason some people get married but if that's the only reason for the marriage I do agree that it is pointless. And presumably you marry someone to provide help and an additional role model to your children, which is never a bad thing to have. But ultimately I do believe that a promise of love, even through the crappy times, is the reason for marriage and that promise can be a safety net for us as we struggle through a sometimes harsh world
2007-02-28 06:14:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jon C 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
marriage girl financially sound educated
2016-02-01 02:55:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋