English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

To compete with the Phoenix's and Dallas', I think they need as much offensive threats in the starting lineup as they can. I'd start a Smith/Iverson backourt. He never did that, but did a Diawara/Iverson backourt when JR went down. What gives George =/

2007-02-28 06:04:26 · 6 answers · asked by MidnightSky 2 in Sports Basketball

when JR gets healthy again

2007-02-28 06:05:44 · update #1

remember Blake and Iverson already had been starting until Smith went down. Then he put Iverson at point and Diawara at the 2, but never did that with JR.

2007-02-28 06:22:56 · update #2

6 answers

personally, i like jr just because hes a bigger threat, but for the good of the team, i would start blake. he is denvers most non selfish player and a true point gaurd. blake also shoots 4 shots less (on avg) than jr and is denvers assist leader behind ai only by .3 as. the ways he spreads the floor and controls the ball will allow ai to not cause his costly TO's and will take pressure off of him to distribute to the rest of the team. he would make ai's game more natural and constant rather than for him to attempt to be the teams playmaker.
Blake is also able to see defensive flaws and is able to set up shots for others whereas jr doesnt know who to create his own shot yet

2007-02-28 06:22:10 · answer #1 · answered by nguyensasian 2 · 0 0

JR Smith

2007-02-28 14:20:38 · answer #2 · answered by madskisr2345 1 · 0 0

Smith.

2007-02-28 16:51:04 · answer #3 · answered by #24 Jeff Gordon Rules!!!!!!!!!!! 3 · 0 0

jr smith

2007-02-28 15:02:38 · answer #4 · answered by redboc24 2 · 0 0

JR, mainly because you'll have two 6ft guards if you start blake AI

2007-02-28 14:59:55 · answer #5 · answered by kky1313131313 4 · 0 0

You would have 2 becasue teams were exploiting there back courts size during there losing skid

2007-02-28 14:12:24 · answer #6 · answered by Lord Vader 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers