I just got finished reading the book For Laci written by her mother. In the book it talked about when they found the bodies, Conner and Laci washed ashore separate. If she was 7 1/2 months pregnant, wouldn't Conner still been inside of her? Also, it mentioned that just her torso was recovered. What happened to the rest of her? Did Scott do that to her or what?
2007-02-28 04:46:49 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Yes Scott did that to her and his son. Sorry pig, yes there is a special place in hell for him and he can't get there soon enough for me. As to the condition of the body, we don't know exactly how he put her in the bay, we do know there were maybe five missing weights. Her head may have had a weight tied to her neck, maybe he tied weights to her arms and legs. The fish would have eaten on her. Sounds horrible I know. The uterus is so strong that it was the last thing to decompose, thus the baby exited from there. As far as how the remains came to shore, I believe it was meant to be. That would also explain why Connor was in such good condition, if he would have exited the body in Dec. there would be nothing left of him. I am close to some of the people involved in this case. Laci "went missing" at Christmas and was found with her son at Easter. God Bless Laci's family.
2007-02-28 17:22:48 · answer #1 · answered by lucysmom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She was truely sleeping with the fishes. What kind of world are we living in where someone does this? I think there's something in the food or water . It is happening too often . We have a long list. Just sorry the family had to be so close to that pscho . Poor people will never be the same .
I think there should be test to weed out these guys at a young age. Certainly we have the technology but that would be infringing on our privacy rights. We could start letting some bad seed s available for adotion to other countries.
I'm surprized he hasn't gotten a Damer party for his behavior .
2007-02-28 04:57:11 · answer #2 · answered by westhighland 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The remainder of her body was never found.....and the condition of the body did not give them enough information to determine whether her body was severed while in the water or other pre immersion means.
As for the baby being found outside her body - that is explained in many sites with information about this case....spontaneous expulsion of the baby is possible...and depending on WHEN the baby was released, the gestation time could have been much longer! [she had missing for some time before her body was found]
2007-02-28 04:51:52 · answer #3 · answered by sage seeker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The details of death are ugly...
The baby was expelled from the mothers' womb due to the natural buildup of gases that comes from the decay of her body.
As for there just being a torso - water does terrible things to a submerged body as well as the aquatic life that fed on her. The poor women simply rotted and was washed about, that's all.
2007-02-28 04:51:10 · answer #4 · answered by dingobluefoot 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Caution: this is graphic..
The bodies were found separately because as they spent time in the water and decomposed, the muscle and tissues holding her body together and keeping the baby inside of her deteriorated to the point that eventually the baby's corpse sort of floated out of mom's corpse.
2007-02-28 04:51:02 · answer #5 · answered by Heidi B 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
As gross as it sounds, the surf ripped some flesh away and the rest was eaten by fish and other marine life. Scott Peterson, theres a special place in hell reserved for you.
2007-02-28 04:50:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
the waters elements caused the baby to seperate from her body. as well as her other parts seperated from her torso. even tho the water did that part it was still scott that did it to her by putting her in the water in the first place.
2007-02-28 04:50:46 · answer #7 · answered by jezbnme 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think the water eroded her body away from being in the water so long. The parts they did not find were just denigrated.
2007-02-28 04:49:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the reason conner was out of her body pushed him out they said when he came out he was alive but drowned. I dont know about the torroso i guess he could of done that or animals or somethin i guess i dont know about that part.
2007-02-28 04:50:58 · answer #9 · answered by knowssignlanguage 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because of decomp the baby could have been push out of her after death. the legs and arms were either cut off or eaten of in the water. what did you think of the book? i haven't read it.
2007-02-28 05:48:54 · answer #10 · answered by favoritson 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋