English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Lets face it Iraq and Saddam, were never a threat to us, but they were to Israel.
During the next fifty years we will do the same to Iran and Syria, guaranteed because they also pose a threat to Israel.

Obviously American media and government wont tell you this, including people in this very question. However masses of people in other countries already know this, but they cant do anything about it. That’s why its important to research for yourself.

Front Page Mar 31, 2004
Iraq was invaded 'to protect Israel' - US official By Emad Mekay
WASHINGTON - Iraq under Saddam Hussein did not pose a threat to the United States, but it did to Israel, which is one reason why Washington invaded the Arab country, according to a speech made by a member of a top-level White House intelligence group.
Inter Press Service uncovered the remarks by Philip Zelikow, who is now the executive director of the body set up to investigate the terrorist attacks on the US in September 2001 - the 9/11

http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/title3.htm#GREATER%20ISRAEL

2007-02-28 04:46:12 · 5 answers · asked by crimson f 1 in Games & Recreation Other - Games & Recreation

5 answers

that's not exactly a reputable source but I agree with you. The U.S. is much more involved in Israel then it should be. If it were up to me I would give Israel back to the people they stole it from and end the whole conflict.

Let's face it. Do you really think the 9/11 bombers hated us because we have freedom of religion or are capitalists. NO, it because we have screwed them over and over for the sake of Israel.

And do you know why we have provided this unrelenting support of Israel? Money. Every one knows you can buy your way in this country and there's plenty of rich jews that have done just that.

During WW2 the rich jews who were politically well connected knew Hitler was planing something so they all evacuated the country and headed for Allied countries. And after WW2 the rich politically well connected decided to pull some strings and take Israel.

Now I'm not saying I hate jews. Or that the holocaust never happened. In fact I understand why they wanted their own country. I just think that Israel should not just have been taken. Also it not exactly a secret that their are many wealthy jews in America. So you can go ahead and think I'm anti- semitic if you want but you'll be wrong. I just believe that the wealthy jewish population has a larger influence in america then most people think and that they use it to keep the U.S. tied up in Israel's problems.

2007-02-28 04:52:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Here is a list of viable candidates... chosen for size alone, so we can get in and out in a timely fashion. The Marshall islands has the added advantage of being administered by the U.S. so we already have an established presence there.

Vatican City - 0.2 square miles
Monaco - 0.7 square miles
Nauru - 8.5 square miles
Tuvalu - 9 square miles
San Marino - 24 square miles
Liechtenstein - 62 square miles
Marshall Islands - 70 square miles
Saint Kitts and Nevis - 104 square miles
Seychelles - 107 square miles
Maldives - 115 square miles
Malta - 122 square miles
Grenada - 133 square miles
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines - 150 square
Barbados - 166 square miles
Antigua and Barbuda - 171 square miles
Andorra - 180 square miles
Palau - 191 square miles

2007-02-28 12:56:14 · answer #2 · answered by nostromobb 5 · 1 0

Well according to my game of risk(since this is the GAMES section) I would likely go to the Asia area. See they are all built up but a good roll or two of the dice and I could crush it.

2007-02-28 13:27:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How about Saudi Arabia? Don't they harbor terrorists?

2007-02-28 12:54:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why do you keep posting the same question?

2007-02-28 15:49:15 · answer #5 · answered by Akkakk the befuddled 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers