Cheney, hands down!
2007-02-28 04:15:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Starla_C 7
·
5⤊
9⤋
No. perhaps i'm slightly jaded, yet i do no longer evaluate any of the persons who now call themselves "conflict heroes" (Kerry, relatively) of incredibly being conflict heroes. clarification for this? My dad: Vietnam and Korean conflict vet. SHOT thrice in Vietnam (and nonetheless stayed till his excursion replaced into up, in spite of the certainty that it meant lacking the start of his and my mom's first baby), and two times in Korea. He fought in the Korean conflict on the age of 17. So. call Bush, Cheney and Limbaugh what you will, yet Bush nonetheless has one over Clinton: He incredibly served in the protection tension. i do no longer carry Limbaugh in severe regards besides. To be honest, especially cases i think of he's a Democrat out to make Republicans look undesirable. I incredibly have blended thoughts approximately Cheney. His deferments have basically been publicized because of the fact of his place. Many others did a similar difficulty. Granted, i do no longer trust what he did, yet I comprehend it, and it replaced into actual extra acceptable than different persons (who dodged the draft via hiding out in Canada, or protested the conflict vehemently.). besides, there have been various US presidents who served in the protection tension without serving in a conflict. And there have additionally been some who sent 1000's of troops to their deaths, and did no longer serve in any respect (Wilson. He replaced right into a great president, yet nonetheless.).
2016-12-14 07:32:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They both can be cowards. Just like any one else. We are not all brave people all the time. We do run away from things at some time. No one is the bigger coward.
2007-02-28 04:46:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by ~ever lasting~ 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
It is so disgusting to click on just about any question in politics and seeing nothing but endless immature irrational garbage. What ever happened
to the open exchange of ideas? When did insults,emotional outburst and
vituperation take the place of facts and ideas in debate? Just look at the answers your are receiving. How many well thought out, logical, rational answers to your question do you see? (setting aside how ill conceived your question is)
I saved this rely to a folder on my desktop to use over and over again because it's the most appropriate answer to the overwhelming
majority of the questions posted in the politics section.
2007-02-28 04:26:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Vice President Cheney has spent more time in his undisclosed location. President Bush spent an awful lot of time flying around on September 11. On balance, I give it to Cheney. I don't think Mr. Bush had much of a choice in the matter.
Both live in fear of actually hearing dissenting voices, though.
2007-02-28 04:22:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by mykll42 2
·
4⤊
4⤋
Easy, Neither. The correct question is who is the biggest coward, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, or John Kerry.
2007-02-28 04:20:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by az 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
I would have to say that you are. Oh, wait, maybe its Clinton, was he getting a BJ when the first WTC attack happened? Hmm, or maybe he was getting one when the S.S. Cole was bombed. he didnt have the balls that it took to run this country which is why we are at war today. He didnt do his job. Maybe he looked to Kennedy for advice, ya know the one that was drunk driving and killed someone? My brother was in Somalia when Clinton was in office. He did crap for our troops. Go get a life, go vote and change the world. Did you serve your country? I bet not. So, hands down, again to answer your question YOU ARE THE COWARD
2007-02-28 04:27:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by tcg7213 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
This is a very hard question from which to offer an unbaised opinion. I would have to settle for Bush, because ultimately he holds the top office and should have kept Cheney in check.
2007-02-28 04:24:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Iran Refuses to Stop File Sharing, U.S. Will Invade
Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, defiantly listens to a pirated copy of Les Miserables
EL PASO, Texas — Iran continues to violate international law and persists in harboring those who practice illegal file sharing and so will face the consequences: genocide and civil war.
Shunning even the appearances of international approval, George W. Bush, the self-lauding 'War Prezdent,' and his mentor, Dick 'Dead Eye' Cheney, avoided going to the U.N., and also avoided seeking congressional approval, and merely telephoned threats and initial air strikes from a Chicken Wings R Us near El Paso, Texas.
"Fahl-sherrun will not be tallrated - nowai-nohah - give Prezdent Mahmud Aljohnnymad two friggin days tahget dahell outta Dodge," the Pesident is quoted as saying.
"Nah. Duh Ree cordun En dustry *** sossation of Amuricah, identified twenny rogue terrurist nayshuns to which ... ah, by from, uh ... to wit ... uh ... well nah, it has found the most mass copyright vilations – MCVs - so far this here yehear - an we will keel them," he pledged.
In a related story, Vice-President Cheney continues his "Go Fu+k Yourself World Tour" this last week, and has so far managed to threaten over twenty-five different nations with embargoes and/or invasion. "If we can't win an election at home, we will steal as many as we can and leave the Democrats with twenty or thirty separate wars to deal with - let'em suck on that with a smile," he said.
It is widely believed that the Vice President plans to make several such forays in the near future. After leaving office, should he elect to do so, it is widely accepted that the Vice President will not be able to leave the United States for fear of arrest as a war criminal. He has indictments pending in the World Court as well has in over one hundred and sixty
2007-02-28 04:27:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Those who come up with your kind of questions.
If coward or not serving in the military is such a big deal to you can you explain Clinton who loath the military was up against 2 WWII vets who served.
2007-02-28 04:18:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋
Neither. The true test of cowardice is running from perceived threats. That they don't do. The real cowards are each and every liberal who advocates running from our battle with, dare I say, Islam. If we don't face this challenge, the inevitable nuclear Holocaust will kill millions.
2007-02-28 04:25:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by finishdetails 1
·
2⤊
4⤋