I cannot believe that people still refer to evolution as a theory. It is a proven fact! Creationism is something the religious zealots came up with in order to explain why the bible is "correct." At no time should religion trump pure science.
2007-02-28 04:16:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by diogenese_97 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Only if it is part of the discussion on origin beliefs of different religions in a comparitive religion class or a social studies class. It certainly does NOT have a place in science class.
The only scientific theory to explain our presence on Earth is evolution, so that is the only thing that should be taught in science class. Now, if people think it should be shown that there are many gaps in the evidence to support the theory, that's fine, because it's true. Still, it is the only scientifically based theory that ties together the existing evidence.
I do not understand anybody who would put creationism into a science class, or take evolution from a science class.
And I'm a firm believer that God is our creator; I just don't think my beliefs belong in science class. A secondary reason is that it makes no sense to let teachers screw up religion, too! :)
2007-02-28 04:30:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, it should not be taught in public schools, either under the name creationism or intelligent design. Intelligent design is a thinly veiled attempt to add creationism to our schools. Part of our responsiblity to the children in public schools is to not make one group seem more important than another. Children separate themselves into cliques as it is, it is not the job of public school officials to serve that end. It's always amazing to me that those who wish creationism taught have no concern for the children sitting in class who are not Christian at all. Creationism is not taught from a place of simply saying there is a Supreme Being, it is culled from Christian ideals and Bible references. Even if it were more generic in the "Supreme Being" area it still wouldn't fly, there are belief systems that don't include a belief in a Supreme Being at all. If people wish to give their children religious instruction it belongs in their church and their home, period. It just doesn't belong in a public school setting. Children are free to pray quietly to themselves or to read their Bibles during free periods and inbetween classes. If that isn't good enough then the extremists need to send their children to a private Christian school. There's plenty of them around.
2007-02-28 04:34:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
evolution is the closest thing we have to science for an explanation of the creation of the world... while there is no hard evidence... there is much that supports the idea in the natural world... like darwin's ideas of evolution...
creationism is a Bible story... no more provable than any religion's creation story... I don't see how you can teach the one in the Bible and not every other religions creation story?
2007-02-28 04:14:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No.
Creationism is based on a "higher being" creating us. Right now, that is just a fancy name for religion, and that isn't right in the public schools. If you want that taught in schools, then send your kids to private schools.
Evolution at this current stage can be proven scientifically, so as long as it can't be countered with significant proof, it should be taught as fact.
Again, everyone has the right to believe what they choose, but until they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt the creationism theory, it should remain in the churches.
2007-02-28 04:13:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
6⤊
2⤋
i'm uncertain that they meant that purely christian creationism could learn, yet i think of that each and every person the creation memories could a minimum of be mentioned with the main elementary factors. you notice, whilst i became in college, they mentioned that for confident, the creation of existence became attributed to probability, and that i had a undertaking with the reality that this became the only concept taught. there became no point out in any respect of alternative theories, so i think of the colleges could could coach the basics of all theories on the commencing place of existence. that's in comparison to they may well be taking facets, here, in basic terms letting little ones comprehend that there ARE different critiques available. in spite of everything, we weren't there whilst it got here approximately, so how do all of us comprehend for confident? I surely have my own theory that asserts pangea became the backyard of eden, and that the sin of adam and eve led to the wreck up of the backyard of eden(plate tectonics). oh yeah, and that i think of that a hundred,000,000 years is yet an afternoon to God. as an artist i can inform you, as quickly as I create something, it retains on changing until i think like struggling with the creation technique(evolution)!
2016-10-16 22:53:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is up to each state as defined by that state's constitution. Because there is nothing in the US Constitution that addresses this issue, it is delegated to the states under the Bill of Rights, (Amendment 10). Constitutionally, each state is to decide for itself how best to educate it's citizens. Most public schools, however, are pimped out to the federal gov't. That's why we have programs like "No Child Left Behind" and we muddy the waters with issues about "creationism".
2007-02-28 04:37:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by cornbread 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
No it should not be, creationisms is specific to the ideals of a certain religion (Not all religions teach creationism the same)
Evolution does not take a particular theological stance and is therefore more universal.
2007-02-28 04:17:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by smedrik 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think both evolution and creationism should be taught in schools. Honestly I can't imagine why anyone would be against this.
Both sides think the other idea is flawed but practically omnipresent. Kids are going to run into both of these ideas anyways. I'd rather they see them first either at home or in the unbiased setting of a classroom.
We teach kids about slavery, not so they'll become slavemasters, but so that they won't become slave masters.
2007-02-28 04:14:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by The_Music_Man 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yes it should be, in anthropology and mythology classes. Evolution is science, so it should be taught in science classes. Creationism is a religion (scientifically known as mythology), so it should be taught in the appropriate classes. And this is how it is currently done.
2007-02-28 04:24:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Take it from Toby 7
·
1⤊
1⤋