English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Along with the Summer Olympic Games and Winter Olympic Games, would you like to see the commitee come up with Autumn Olympic Games and Spring Olympic Games?

Here's a hypothetical example of when the games would be held:

Summer Olympics: August 2008
Spring Olympics: May 2009
Winter Olympics: February 2010
Autumn Olympics: November 2011

So, with this schedule, we would have some version of Olympic Games every year.

If they could have some good, entertaining games, would you like to see Autumn and Spring olympic games?

2007-02-28 02:40:36 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Olympics

8 answers

No. I believe if this happened, it would devalue the glory of competing in the Olympics and winning an Olympic medal, in very much the same way as a World title in boxing has been devalued by having four of them in each weight class.

2007-02-28 02:46:50 · answer #1 · answered by Oneirokritis 5 · 1 1

I consider you lots! it would additionally provide athletes that don't take part in the two of the Olympics a super gamble to surely characterize their united states and win a medal. Plus, all the activities that have been decrease from the summer season Olympics, may well be super to place into the Spring and Autumn ones. which incorporate Cricket, Croquet, golfing, and Lacrosse. All of those have been decrease so that they could be positioned into the Spring ones. you comprehend what I advise? nicely, i actually think of they could have the Spring and Autumn Olympics! it fairly is one in all those super theory!

2016-10-16 22:46:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think that there are enough sporting events to have that many different games.

If you were to spread out the existing events then each Games would not be the same spectacle that it is now. There will be less athletes, less sports, and overall less interest.

Add to that the fact that it costs the host city billions to put on such an event, having an Olympics every year would end up bankrupting some cities and many more will not vie for the rights to it.

It just wouldn't be a special event anymore.

2007-02-28 04:13:02 · answer #3 · answered by James A 2 · 0 1

No. There are World Championships for many sports between games that suffices my hunger for a big sorting event between Olympiads. I think I would get bored and the anticipation and build up to the games would be gone. When something is around too muchpeople lose interest and latch on to something else(seems the world has a prevalence of ADD)

2007-03-06 01:03:56 · answer #4 · answered by moglie 6 · 0 1

Having this many olympics isn't really needed. All it does is result in people getting too many medals, and making each one worth less. Plus, there's nothing to really put in the newly made olympic games.

2007-02-28 03:20:28 · answer #5 · answered by legendarymasamune 2 · 0 2

Yes, it's a great idea

2014-03-28 04:43:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

spring i think fits the running theme better. plus the weather is usually better, warmer.

2007-02-28 07:18:10 · answer #7 · answered by texcjb 2 · 1 1

yes it would be a great idea

2007-03-04 02:28:36 · answer #8 · answered by jerry 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers