Before you jump down my throat, I would have asked this question sooner but I literally just got my computer back after lending it to someone for two long months so please please please do not crucify me for asking this three weeks too late, okay?
All I wanted to know was this:
What do you guys think of Anna Nicole Smith's premature passing (at 39) and do you feel that it's too much of a coincidence that both her AND her 20 year-old son Daniel died of the same causes (overdose of prescription drugs) only five short months apart?
Is it just me or can you also smell foul play all over this mysterious series of unfortunate events?
And also, where do you think Anna Nicole's body should be buried?
Back in Houston TX, where she was born and raised, or in Nassau Bahamas where she was living at the time of her death (even though she collapsed and died in Hollywood FL), which is also where her five month-old daughter Dannielynn currently lives? And also who should raise Anna Nicole's baby?
2007-02-28 02:18:00 · 9 answers · asked by Lolita Angel Rose Taylor-Kennedy 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
A) I don't think Anna Nicole's and Daniels deaths where just coincidences. I think that either the doctor or the lawyer or both had something to do with them.
B) Anna Nicoles body should not go to her mother in Texas. They never even liked each other. Anna Nicole tried avoiding her mother all the time, why else hadn't she let her meet her new baby daughter or invited her to her most recent wedding?
C) I don't know who should take care of poor Danniel Lynn. It's a sad situation and the poor girl is going to have many questions growing up. I think she needs to go to a good stable family that are prepared for the drama that will be surrounding the child at all times.
2007-02-28 02:30:47 · answer #1 · answered by minicoop_jen 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it's that suspicious her and her son both died so close together. They were both taking dangerous lethal combinations of drugs and it was a ticking time bomb. I feel sorry for the baby because based on what i've seen of the news coverage all of the people fighting for her are all self absorbed money hungry crazies. I think Anna Nicole should be buried in the bahamas because that is where she made the decision to bury her son and they should be together. If she felt any ties to Texas she would've sent her son to be buried there and bought a burial plot for herself there instead of in the Bahamas. Anna had disowned her mother and spoke of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse. If she wanted nothing to do with her mom - not to mention she hadn't seen Daniel in 10 years or ever saw the baby why should she have any control. The only thing Anna made clear in life is that she wanted NOTHING to do with her mother. If there was half a billion dollars at stake I would bet none of these people would care at all.
2007-02-28 02:37:02 · answer #2 · answered by ○•○•Cassie•○•○ 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think it is sad that her and her son are both gone at such a young age, I also think that there is some kind of foul play involved too,people just don't die naturally like that, although I do think that she may have died from a broken heart,her son seemed to be her everything in life and it was probably too much to bear for her,it would be for any Mom-devastating!! I think she should be buried next to her son in the Bahamas it seemed to be the only place where she felt joy and she needs to be next to her son. I think Larry Birkhead is the father and I also think he is the only one who has any sense in his head to raise that little girl.
2007-02-28 02:33:52 · answer #3 · answered by Urchin 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Howard K. Stern should be raising Danielynn and he should be the father. It's not a coincidence that she died at 39, and only five months after her son. I thought of that for quite a while once, but it's simply something of the past, very sad though. It was a drug overdose for both of them, and it couldn't have been foul play because they already investigated that, and it's not. She should be buried next to her son in the Bahamas, of course!
2007-02-28 02:38:08 · answer #4 · answered by sPrInG LiLY 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That's what happens when you do drugs. Sometimes people die. It's sad but a fact of life. Does it matter where she is buried now? Not really, I think most people in her life don't really care. What's important is who the father of that child is. I think it's her son. Strange relationship already. The baby is named after him. The son committed suicide when he couldn't take the stress of it all and that pushed her over the edge too. Tragic, but it all makes sense.
2007-02-28 17:30:53 · answer #5 · answered by shogun_316 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think it is very suspicious. Howard K. Stern is a man who should not be trusted. I'm not sure where the best place for the body is, but I think the best place for the baby is with Larry Birkhead. I think he really is the father, he is the one seeking a paternity test.
2007-02-28 03:04:24 · answer #6 · answered by Tony M 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Indeed it's supicious but she was just a gold digger, wanna be marilyn who choose to take a loco path in her life. She should get buried close to her son and the kid... a good home with parents who actually give her attention and warmth.
2007-02-28 17:11:23 · answer #7 · answered by honey 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i think anna died of a broken heart. there is no other explanation, she was going to get paid from her dead husband, you know how she was, money hungry. but her sons death i think was unbearable. she should be with her son
2007-02-28 02:29:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I swear I don't think about it. I have my own problems. And I have no idea why her death is such a big story. This is a person who is lucky not to have died 20 years ago.
2007-02-28 02:26:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋