especially about Hillary, there are always mostly negative answers? However, when the same or similar Q's are posted in the evenings, the answers are always more intelligent & positive.
2007-02-28
00:49:43
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
Bill Clinton Biography:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/bc42.html
Hillary Clinton biography:
http://clinton.senate.gov/about/biograph...
Hillary Clinton’s chances:
http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/2007/0...
Hillary’s accomplishments:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200610u/g...
Video - DNC – Her own words:
http://www.democrats.org/a/2007/02/hilla...
2007-02-28
00:50:26 ·
update #1
sarge 927: Your angry, hateful rhetoric just proved my point.
2007-02-28
01:37:01 ·
update #2
I think that the day/evening thing has to do with demographics participating at those times of the day.
I don't believe that someone has to agree with your politics in order to be intelligent...but I judge the intelligence on the answer itself. I find far too much mudslinging and childish antics during the day. I long for a good debate on actual issues, rather than personal lives and general blind loyalty to one party or another. It seems impossible to get a direct answer to a political question at any time...as people seem to get caught up in a cat fight.
2007-02-28 02:02:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Super Ruper 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
I've noticed the very same thing. Maybe it's because those who are planning to vote for Sen. Clinton are too busy with their jobs, their families, and their life to sign on for a little private time on YA until the evening. That sounds really snarky doesn't it lol? Sorry, I guess it's a knee-jerk reaction to the silly questions I see every day on YA suggesting Democrats live off the government and don't work for a living. I know, I hang my head down in shame, I try not to resort to the cons tactics, but I think I'll leave this one the way it is.
2007-02-28 13:00:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I take it from the links you posted, and your opinion that negative answers can't be intelligent that this is more of a promotion for Hillary then a question. The obvious answer is there are more people on at night so there are varied answers.
2007-02-28 12:16:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by JB 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
To quote Jeff Foxworthy: "I believe if you can't say something nice about someone, you must be talking about Hillary Clinton..." So the answers are more intelligent and positive at night? Don't think we didn't miss the implication that those who give positive feedback about Hillary are more intelligent than those who don't. Typical liberal elitism. Who died and made you God?
The reason so many people have negative things to say about her, regardless of the time of day, is because many of us have done our homework and know what Hillary REALLY stands for -- anti-capitalism, secular humanism, and total government control over social issues; and we know that it'll actually end up being total government control over EVERYTHING if Hillary gets her way. We also know that she is a cold, calculating, ruthless opportunist who will say or do whatever she believes will win her favor in the eyes of the public, which is why she voted for the war in 2003 (remember, she was aware of ALL the intel collected against Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, and al-Qaeda during her husband's presidency) when popular support for invading Iraq was high and then turned tail and denounced the war in Iraq when popular support for the war went down. She has demonstrated very clearly that she holds herself above the law (she has held off sending in the documents in her possession pertaining to Whitewater longer than our troops have been in Iraq) and she has also demonstrated very clearly that she supports a government where elected officials are not held accountable for their actions -- that is, unless the offending party in question is a conservative. She supports programs that throw billions of dollars at members of our society who are either not legally entitled to aid (illegal immigrants) or make no contribution to our society or our economy (career welfare recipients). She talks out of one side of her mouth claiming that abortion is a woman's right to choose, then talks out of the other side of her mouth saying criminals who have proven that they represent a clear and present danger to society have a right to life, despite the fact that these criminals decided to play God and take the life of someone else.
BOTTOM LINE: Hillary Clinton has the ultimate aim of turning the U.S. into the next Soviet Union (if you don't think so read up on communism and see the similarities) and those of us who know not to believe everything we hear from the mainstream liberal media and investigate ourselves see past her lies and deceptions. She won't get elected -- heck, a recent USA Today poll of registered Democrat voters found that over 50% of them wouldn't vote for her. How's THAT for a vote of no confidence?
P.S.: To the angry, underpaid worker who intends to vote for Hillary in 2008, get over yourself and be thankful that you HAVE a job -- my wife, who has a masters degree and a paralegal certificate from an ABA-approved program, has been out of work for over a year thanks to another female liberal who has spent the last 4 years running Michigan into the ground -- and now to show her support of the plight of the people, her answer to the problem is -- ready for this? -- RAISING TAXES. Great, our governor feels so badly that the people of the state of Michigan have fallen on such hard financial times (primarily because of her) that she's going to help by taking away more of what she knows her constituents don't have?!?!! Yet another page in the Encyclopedia Liberale Hypocritico...
2007-02-28 09:17:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by sarge927 7
·
7⤊
2⤋
Who died and made you boss? Speak for yourself. Because people disagree about Hillary,they are not intelligent. I suppose you give lots of positive feedback about some candidate who's politics you disagree with. Hypocrite!
2007-02-28 09:21:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tin Foil Fez 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Tells FOX News Why Mitt Romney Picked Him for Presidential Campaign
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
By Sara Bonisteel
AP
Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann.
A controversial Arizona sheriff known for making his inmates wear pink underwear and eat green bologna turned his back on his state's favored presidential candidate, opting instead to join forces with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
The Romney camp appointed Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio Monday as honorary chair of the campaign in the state of Arizona.
"The first time I met the governor at a private meeting, first thing he said was 'How's the pink underwear doing?'" Arpaio told FOXNews.com Wednesday.
Romney asked Arpaio to join his campaign in early January after several meetings, said Arpaio, who has made his name with a tough stance on immigration in the nation's fourth largest county.
Click here for FOXNews.com' s 2008 You Decide center.
"I like him," Arpaio said. "He's a man of principle, of good character. He did a great job in Massachusetts and I feel he's going to make a great president."
The sheriff, who was born and raised in Massachusetts, says his role in the campaign will include touting the Republican candidate in speeches throughout the state, and possibly the nation, where the tough-talking sheriff will stress Romney's ethics, his family life and his business acumen as reasons to vote him into office.
But Arpaio's decision to support the former Massachusetts governor begs the question as to why he decided to shirk the hometown candidate, Sen. John McCain . Arpaio refused to answer that question directly, choosing instead to allude to the Vietnam War hero.
"Arizona's important, maybe psychologically and politically because you have a fella here from Arizona running for president," Arpaio said. "And I guess, the hometown boy or the favorite son, they always seem to win; however don't forget, was it Gore that lost his own state in Tennessee?
"So I feel Mr. Romney has a great chance to win Arizona regardless of what polls and everybody else said," he said.
He called former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, also running for president, a "nice guy."
Maricopa County's sheriff made headlines last year for his controversial application of an anti-smuggling law that allowed him to jail illegal immigrants for smuggling themselves into the U.S. Inmates in the county, which includes Phoenix, are housed in a tent city where they are forced to wear pink underwear and eat green bologna.
"I'm sure the governor believes in my philosophy too," Arpaio said. "He sure would not be asking for my endorsement if he didn't believe in what I'm doing."
But Romney will have to win office before he'll get a chance to tour the tents. Four losing presidential contenders — Sens. Bob Dole, McCain, Phil Gramm and Gov. Pete Wilson — have toured the facility. Arpaio doesn't want to jinx Romney into being the fifth.
The Romney 2008 campaign also named Arizona political consultant Jason Rose as the state director of Romney's Republican bid for office.
"Each has many years of experience in Arizona politics and will help us mobilize our already robust network of grassroots support," said Romney in a statement. "They will be strong surrogates for our optimistic message of a stronger and safer America."
2007-03-01 12:28:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who are you the Yahoo police? Keep your propaganda, I will not vote for Hillary. BTW,does that mean you are on Yahoo day and night?
2007-02-28 09:18:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by chickyboom 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
Because this site is full of kids and angry underpaid workers during the day. I, by the way, will vote for Hillary in 2008!
2007-02-28 08:54:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
7⤋
Who cares! The Clintons are more concerned about themselves and they don't give a hoot what people on here think.
2007-02-28 08:56:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by az 4
·
2⤊
5⤋