Be & then you will have all that you need.
All the possessions in the world won't matter if you don't know or don't like who you are.
When you are happy with yourself & love yourself, you need very little.
It is far better to be than to have. Your character is more valuable than earthly riches.
So, be. Just be and let everything else sort itself out...
2007-02-28 00:09:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by amp 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'd like to say neither. I don't think you can have one without the other. To have means the possibility of gaining and therefore losing. Losing is often painful. However, I can't imagine only being without having those experiences. That's just lame and painful on its own. It's not worth the while. So, I'll take all or nothing.
2007-02-28 10:34:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by filledesarcenciel 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Behave
2007-02-28 11:24:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by smartobees 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
aspiring to become someone with intrinsic values can help one to have the things in life..being is akin to having.
2007-02-28 08:29:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by maconsolviaa 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a silly question. You have to be before you can have. I don't understand what you are getting at.
2007-02-28 08:20:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Watcher 465 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
To be. To have means to risk losing.
2007-02-28 09:35:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by lisateric 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
To be - however it is useful to have somethings like food, shelter, etc.
2007-02-28 08:06:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Freethinking Liberal 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
both would be nice but it would have to be to be lol
2007-02-28 09:43:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by mixraceQT 3
·
0⤊
0⤋