English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

if they wanted you to believe 2+2=5, you probably would. They want you to believe that 19 hijackers with box cutters were able to demolish three buildings. 6 of whom are still alive! they want you to think that steel melts at temperatures that regular fires burn at. They want you to think that the muslims were able to suspend the laws of physics! Why do you listen to these people, especially when they have a record of lying in the past! I am not a conspiracy theorist. I am just a regular american who sees the holes in the official story.

2007-02-27 23:39:59 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Why do you think the war on terror is being fought seriously, while the borders are wide open?

2007-02-27 23:41:12 · update #1

There are lots of good documentaries out there so that you don't have to do anything by yourself. read other people's research.

watch "9/11 mysteries: demolitions" or "terrorstorm" or "loose change" or "america: from freedom to fascism" or "911: the road to tyranny"

all of which are available on google video.

2007-02-27 23:50:18 · update #2

search the bbc website for hijackers still alive

or look it up on google. They have been interviewed, still alive!

2007-02-27 23:51:43 · update #3

that popular mechanics piece doesn't even address the most important questions of 9/11. They take some straw man theories and debunk them. they also don't even footnote any of their statements, something that many conspiracy theorists do.

I am not theorizing exactly who was conspiring, i just know it would take people that have access to the world trade center to plant explosives. Marvin Bush was running security on the World trade center complex.

2007-02-27 23:54:39 · update #4

And he wouldn't let bomb sniffing dogs in for two weeks before 9/11, after the wtc was shut down for "electrical maintenance"

2007-02-27 23:55:48 · update #5

no steel building has ever collapsed due to fires.

Building 7 was not hit by a plane and it collapsed, perfectly into its own footprint, exactly like a demolition.

2007-02-27 23:57:30 · update #6

the osama bin laden confession video was not real. Look that up on google too. It was obviously not bin laden. In fact, bin laden denied involvement in the attacks. Bin laden was a CIA asset, codenamed Tim Osman. Look that up too.

2007-02-28 00:05:48 · update #7

Bin laden was also reported to have been visited in the hospital during the summer before 9/11 by a cia agent.

2007-02-28 00:06:29 · update #8

i know what a conspiracy theory is. I don't know ehat happened on 9/11 i just know i have looked at lots of evidence that suggests the government is lying. I demand that we RE INVESTIGATE 9/11.

2007-02-28 00:12:41 · update #9

they did a great job of covering up. the temperature thing is just one of thousands of things. The towers could not fall in 10 seconds without the help of explosives. it should have taken 85 seconds or so to fall, taking the resistance it would encounter into the equation.

But i am talking about building 7. Building 7 was not hit by a plane! how do you explain that? the 9/11 commission did not explain that!

2007-02-28 01:09:30 · update #10

you are wrong! they are the exact people that supposedly hijacked the planes. There is not a shred of evidence that puts those terrorists on the airplanes. How come the FBI hasn't changed their story, if the people that hijacked the planes were using someone else's ID? how come FBI wouldn't put their real names? Look, man, the official theory is much less possible than a theory that involves the government in the attacks. It is all very very fishy. If we would have been allowed to investigate 9/11 properly in the first place, we would have much more evidence. We know that Bush and Cheney, early on, approached the leaders of the House and Senate and urged them not to investigate the pre-9/11 activities of the Administration.We know that the Bush Administration has stonewalled and delayed turning over essential information to the 9/11 Committee.

At the very least the administration had prior knowledge, but explosives were definitely used to bring those three buildings down.

2007-02-28 19:53:37 · update #11

If they weren't the ones who hijacked the planes, who were the real hijackers? this story came out a long time ago, and they still haven't found out the real identity of the hijackers? please. Give me a phucking break.

2007-02-28 19:57:16 · update #12

Ball for you, i really wish that it wasn't an inside job. i don't want the government to do things like this! it took me a very long time to accept the fact that they must have been involved. If the official story could be proven, or the theory that the government was involved was dis proven, i would be very relieved.

I am not leaving anything out or distorting truth. Neither are the people that made the documentaries. they are genuine americans with genuine concerns about the criminals behind the scenes in the government. Very brave people. please don't accuse me of intentionally distorting the truth, because i am not a liar.

2007-02-28 20:03:06 · update #13

BTW nobody takes the missile theories seriously. That was a rumor that was actually started by donald rumsfeld. Also, Cheney never ordered any planes shot down. NORAD was told to stand down. The truth is we don't know what happened to flight 93. I would really like to get the data from the cockpit voice recorder, but it is being held away from the public, just like the rest of them.

2007-02-28 20:06:26 · update #14

Rumsfeld's exact words are:

"Here we're talking about plastic knives, and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building, and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center."

- Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, in an interview with Parade Magazine on October 12, 2001, from inside the Pentagon.




HE STARTED THAT RUMOR!!! it sounds ridiculous! thats why a lot of people hear that and think thats impossible or thats crazy.

It was definitely a plane that hit the pentagon, and planes that hit the twin towers, and no planes hit Building 7.

Some debris fell on building 7, and the building did not even catch on fire until later in the day! it was a small fire. Be honest, I am being honest with you!

2007-02-28 20:16:29 · update #15

these things that you are talking about are not even the major issues of 9/11, or you are getting the theories wrong. You take the most ridiculous sounding theories and refute them. Like i said, i don't know what happened to flight 93. thats not as important as building 7 and the twin towers which were obviously demolished.

2007-02-28 20:19:29 · update #16

I am curious, ballforyou, can you try and debunk all of the put options that were put on American Airlines and United Airlines? And what about all of the insider trading that was going on in building 7 before it fell? don't tell me the hijackers made those put options!

For those of you that don't know: a put option is basically a bet that the stock is going to crash.

* Huge surges in purchases of put options on stocks of the two airlines used in the attack -- United Airlines and American Airlines
* Surges in purchases of put options on stocks of reinsurance companies expected to pay out billions to cover losses from the attack -- Munich Re and the AXA Group
* Surges in purchases of put options on stocks of financial services companies hurt by the attack -- Merrill Lynch & Co., and Morgan Stanley and Bank of America
* Huge surge in purchases of call options of stock of a weapons manufacturer expected to gain from the attack -- Raytheon

2007-02-28 20:29:50 · update #17

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/wtc7.html

here is a website with photos of building 7, with the minor fires in it. This on actually has a close up of the building, unlike ballforyou's photos, which just shows a bunch of smoke.

2007-02-28 20:45:30 · update #18

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7.html

here are several photos showing how minor the fires are. click on the titles to enlarge the photos.

Do you still think that fires made that building collapse?

2007-02-28 20:49:53 · update #19

14 answers

The truth hurts. And some people are so lazy, that it's just easier to believe what the government says...than to spend time seeking out the truth for themselves.
As the saying goes....Truth is stranger than fiction. Oh, that reminds me of one. Did you ever see the movie The Abyss? In it, there is a scene where this diver is going to go down far enough where his oxygen will run out. So...they make him inhale this green gooey gel stuff into his lungs. That stuff allows one to actually breathe the oxygen that is in the water. I thought that was so cool.....then I learned that the US Navy has it! And uses it. It IS for real. I thought that was so interesting. Something that seemed too wild to ever be true....actually is. So...why can't some people believe that 9-11 was an inside job?? I guess they just don't have an inquiring mind like some of us.

2007-02-28 03:06:54 · answer #1 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 1 0

I think we've been programmed to believe, but not all of us do. At least some of us still have minds that we can use.
I don't know about melting temperatures, physics, and all, but I do know that the muslim broadcasts claimed responsibility.

Open borders? That is a problem. I don't think there's much stopping anyone from walking right in from either the North or the South.

If this were a war on terrorists, I would think it would have been more directed at the terrorists, and not whole countries. Just my opinion, I guess. What's getting at me now is the sounds being made about Iran...it's almost like they're trying to make a case for an attack on them.

This one thing I do know-whether we like it or not, this is a religious war, declared by Bin Laden on the West, and on Christianity. And seeing how THAT religion doesn't forgive, this will last forever. Remember, the attack in Spain was because of what happened there 500 years ago. They pull anything up as a reason to attack us "infidels."

2007-02-28 07:53:28 · answer #2 · answered by Jed 7 · 1 0

I've got a question. What authority told you these things that you believe. Have you even seen the WTC? If not, then how do you know they were even there? How do you know the entire thing wasn't some big fib just to confuse you?

This may shock you, but ramming a plane with a building tends to kill the people in the plane. All of the hijackers are dead.

The melting point of steel......Tell me, have you ever seen a car crash? Did the steel melt and then break? Are you familiar the the term "force" and the impact of applied "force" that a large jet would have on steel coming in at a high velocity?

Not a conspiracy theorist.......right........

I've got a question. Do you know what a conspiracy is?

2007-02-28 07:46:45 · answer #3 · answered by The_Music_Man 3 · 1 1

stop knocking yourself out. Bin Laden admitted that his boys hit the World T.S. buildings. I saw an interesting engineering documentary on why the buildings collapsed and your theory about fire temperature and so on is all wrong. There was no conspiracy. The Muslims did the job and they all died. What about the fourth plane that crashed in Penna? It had Muslim terrorists aboard. Plug the holes in your story before pointing at everyone else.

2007-02-28 08:32:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I saw the second Plane go in to the WTC from across the river and Lost my Uncle PAPD in the attack. I saw enough to realize it was real. Anyone can get sucker punched or assassinated. Why don't you learn the truth? Steel does melt even in common apartment fires. I have a Picture of a steel I beam that is twisted like a pretzel from a 3 story Brick apartment building fire. The WTC was designed to come down when it has out lived it's use and had "planned Obsolescence" designed in. Please stop lying to yourself.

2007-02-28 07:55:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Unfortunately the American people, originally a proud and independent self-reliant people, have been gradually conditioned to trust and obey authority.

The nation which should stand upright and never grovel or beg has been taught that you should trust and obey authority.

Instead of a National Day of Reason, somebody gave us a National Day of Prayer. Get down on your knees, you slave, and ask massah to rescue you; this plantation is UNDER him.

Trust us, we're from the government, we're here to help.

Trust and obey,
For there's no other way,
To be happy in Jesus,
But to trust and obey.

2007-02-28 07:52:57 · answer #6 · answered by fra59e 4 · 1 0

By gum, you're right! I'm going to buy a plane ticket to New York right now and start my own investigation of 9/11.

(I've heard that Muslims can suspend the laws of physics, but only if they're Sufis.)

2007-02-28 07:43:30 · answer #7 · answered by Chris A 7 · 1 1

Blindly trust the government? Oh, please. And exactly how do you think we 'blind' Americans set about to discover the truth? Such sarcastic and incendiary remarks.

You could have put your question out here in much better format.

2007-02-28 07:45:03 · answer #8 · answered by rrrevils 6 · 0 2

I am sure that David copperfield made them dissappear, just like he made the statue of liberty disappear.......sheeezzz

2007-02-28 07:51:41 · answer #9 · answered by wolfwagon2002 5 · 1 1

puff puff pass. Why do you people think you would still be alive if what you are saying is true?

2007-02-28 07:44:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers