English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Come on NeoCons, it is always Bushs market whenit is good.

2007-02-27 20:07:39 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Economics

3 answers

Thank you for proving that you know ZERO about the stock market.
.

2007-02-28 00:21:49 · answer #1 · answered by Zak 5 · 0 0

What the ^&^&*#$! Bush has nothing to do with the plundge and I never thought the economy or the market was good when Bush was president. I don't think Neo cons ever given credit to Bush for the economy. Probably because at best our economy was mediocre during the Bush Presidency. I do find it interesting that Liberals still say how great the Economy was under Clinton, even though at the end of his Presidency, the Stock market crashed. Most Economist blame Clinton for the Internet bubble, because he failed to cool the stock market while he's president. (WHich is what the CHinese is trying to do now and why our stock market plunge) Most economist also blame Clinton for the Enron type scandals due to Clintons deregulation. And now there is evident that the Real estate bubble is partially Clintons fault for not regulating the Mortgage companies as per instruction of Alan Greenspan. Yeah Bush is destroying the Economy, but thats because he's following CLintons lead of deregulation and allowing mega mergers.

2007-02-28 04:26:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm not a Neocon or republican, but Bush has very little to do with the market, good or bad. Besides, nobody should be laughing at the US economy. If the market turns sour in the US, then the whole world will feel it because the economy is globalized. Good US market is good for the world. A bad market hurts world wide economies and people around the world.

2007-02-28 04:33:26 · answer #3 · answered by Kenneth C 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers