Why not bring the terrorists here?

Question

The jingoist neocon's kneejerk excuse for the silly War on Terror is "It's better to fight 'em over there than over here!" But where would you rather fight the terrorists: on their turf, where they are familiar with the terrain, or here in the streets of America where we have the home field advantage?

Answer 1

In the politics world, US want to dominate using all legal and illegal methods. These unfair policies raise the hatred of the US worldwide.

The best way to stop attacks is to make others Love USA instead of hating it. If there are too many people hate USA worldwide, there will be very good chances to see people who are so angry of USA that they want to do something aggressive against it. Then, the chances of attacks increase gradually.

Again: The best way to stop attacks is to make others Love USA instead of hating it.

Kind Regards

Answer 2

You're not serious are you? How many people do you know who would actually take to the streets and fight this "silly war on terror"? You really think it is better to subject our children to that kind of warfare in our own streets than to keep it there and prevent it from coming here? I don't understand this kind of logic. We have a trained volunteer military who are willing and very capable of taking care of business over there so we DON'T have to deal with it here. Just look at some of the answers on here and it is obvious that too many would be cowering somewhere, looking for someone else to come and save their sorry rear ends. It would be interesting to see how many of these terrorists would change their mission and point of view after "talking things over" and getting a nice hug as some seem to believe is the answer.

Answer 3

Can you say with all honesty and with all of your heart you'd want the blood to flow in our streets, our children at risk when they leave the house seeing them get blown up by a suicide bomber, or car bomb? Losing our cities, towns and villages by explosions and 'countless Americans' killed on a daily basis?

When there are terrorists around, there isn't a 'home court' advantage. They KNOW this nation and when you've stopped shaking your head 'no' watch this interview.

http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=LK07B70&f=PW07B04&t=e

It's with 3 former terrorists, who are now practicing tolerance and even THEY said Bush was right. Take the fighting to 'their turf' not the U.S. Besides...they know the U.S. because since 1980 they been breeding them here, and the money is coming from Big Business in the Dearborn/Detroit, MI area. In fact, one of them that is interviewed was born in Dearborn. They recruit from the U.S. and the Muslims who live here. It's not just a kneejerk reaction, but a necessity.

Answer 4

This is a good question. Because that's the way it should really be. We should be minding our own business and protecting our own boarders. Like George Washington said...The United States should not meddle in other countries affairs. We shouldn't even be in Iraq because President Bush lied through his teeth when he said that Saddam was addicted to WMD. Also Bush played his "false flag" card when he blew up the WTC and rushed us into the middle east.

You ever think if the United States wasn't well established in the middle east....that there might not be so many terrorist pisssed off and willing to attack us?

I agree with you....let some of these terrorist come over here and open up a "can of wooop asss" and see what happens to them.

Answer 5

So our military has sustained losses in the few thousands. Their military and citizens have suffered in the 10s of thousands. If they were here, they would not abide by rules of engagement or the geneva convention (they already use their own people as human shields), so you can be sure that our casualties would be in the 100s of thousands or even millions. Which is the better scenario? Simple math, here.

Answer 6

Let's analyze this, shall we?
1.) You're an idiot
2.) The terrorists' are already quite familiar with our terrain.
3.) You tatertots-for-brains liberals would be the first to run
4.) You sh** for brains liberals would insist on the Geneva Conventions.
5.) You sh** for brains liberals would announce barbequed chicken for all terrorists during their noon-day prayers as well as the latest sales at Wal-Mart.
6.) You sh** for brains liberals would be screaming for Americans not to violate the terrorists' Constitutional rights.
7.) You sh** for brains liberals would insist on the American taxpayers footing the bill to transport them over here for a rumble in the streets.
8.) And did I say you're an idiot yet? You're an idiot.
Meg D- Please be strong. Don't give up. This too shall pass. If you must cry, we'll all understand. We, too, weep over such ignorance.

Answer 7

The number of attacks against America has increased (thankfully foiled) since we started fighting them "over there" [Bush himself has mentioned some of these foiled attacks], so it that doesn't work.

I don't think your idea is any smarter though.

Smarter idea is for us to gain energy independence, and then let them get on with their lives, and us with ours.

Answer 8

i'm outraged that Obama did no longer do it quicker. And that Bushyboy did no longer do it in any respect. the two considered one of them are anti-democratic and desire secret hearings, and are against public understanding of what's occurring. solar is the suited disinfectant. i'm hoping some day they're the two on public trial themselves. .

Answer 9

man are you jokeing ? most people here dont owen a gun and do you want your city under attack we cant even rebuild after katrina hit were still way behind americans dont have insurance for this our country would look like a war zone people couldnt handle it mentaly . bush is doing the right thing .

Answer 10

I am with you. Let them come. I will stand. Right now we are fighting fear. Our fear that something might happen. F That! Let us face the issues in our country. If is an issue here let us solve it here. Policing the world is not our job.