English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I previously posted a question with the same title as this one. (You can refer to it to see all the curious details)
Since that question was posted, Hillary somehow, mysteriously extended her question another 2 weeks without signing in. (Still has the same 96 points)
Yahoo staff claims...
"This is not an endorsement. We are not siding with any candidate or party -- in general or for the 2008 US elections."
What do you believe is acctually going on here?

2007-02-27 16:36:02 · 7 answers · asked by Write Your Name Here 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

to cajun police: Yes it matters. I'm curious of some details (since this has never happened to me)...
1) Do you sign OUT of Yahoo Q&A when you leave?
2) Do you turn your computer off every day/night?
Maybe it reads your saved history pages and goes back to your previously viewed (cached) page instead of a renewed/refreshed version.
Next time this occurs, would you please try "refreshing" the page & see if you then receive the additional point for visiting? I'd appreciate it if you could let me know the outcome of this experiment. It would give some light to possible explanations to the mystery of my question. You can post it as a comment right here on this question for all to see.
I'm looking for the truth, not to spread rumors or false accusations.

2007-03-01 06:22:40 · update #1

7 answers

well, if it matters, i've signed in many times and did not get my one point.
for some reason i couldn't get the comment section...hmm? if the information that you have listed is all factual, then it is what it is.
as far as knowing whether or not i had signed in or turned off my computer, i don't know, sorry. i do remember a few time attempting to sign out and back in with no results of points.
hope this helps.

2007-02-28 13:56:39 · answer #1 · answered by REALLY 5 · 1 0

Percent of People 25 Years and Over Who Have Completed a Bachelor's Degree (year 2000)

1 District of Columbia 41.0 BLUE
2 Massachusetts 35.0 BLUE
3 Connecticut 33.3 BLUE
4 Colorado 32.9 RED
5 Maryland 31.5 BLUE
6 New Jersey 31.0 BLUE
7 New Hampshire 30.3 RED
8 Virginia 30.1 RED
9 Washington 29.4 BLUE
10 Vermont 28.3 BLUE
11 New York 28.1 BLUE
12 Minnesota 27.7 BLUE
13 California 27.5 BLUE
13 Hawaii 27.5 BLUE
15 Illinois 26.9 BLUE

Blue = Al gore Red = George Bush 2000 elections

12/15 of the top 15 states who have "People 25 Years and Over Who Have Completed a Bachelor's Degree" voted for Al gore in 2000

What this has to do with the question no idea but I find it interesting.

2007-02-27 17:49:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Dear God, I hope not.....

Hillary makes me ill.... Seriously.

The Clinton's ARE liars...... and I'm certainly NOT voting for this Clinton package of lies!

Hillary has high negative ratings. There are a lot of people that REALLY dislike her these are a few of the reasons:

-- Hillary voted for the Iraq war and did not apologize for her vote. Her decision not to apologize is regarded as a significant bad decision and turning point that makes her not electable as president.
-- Hillary is the liberal media's sweetheart, but not America's sweatheart
-- The Clintons LIE and her husband was impeached for lying and committing purjury
-- Her failed socialized medicine healthcare program under her husband
-- Her shrieking voice that grates on people
-- She not presidential
-- She is very liberal even more than her husband, but bends (lies) politically to pick up votes and reverts back. This is called a "phony."
-- This would bring her husband back into politics and many people do not like that idea.
-- Her husband also has high negative approval ratings.
-- White Water fraud
-- Hates the military, but acts like she likes them to get into office.
-- Her approach would most likely bring more terrorist activity to the US.

We've had almost twenty years of the clinton-bush dynasty. Aren't we ready for a freakin break? If we vote in the shrieking "B", the dynasty could go to almost THIRTY years. Then Jeb Bush could add another eight years??!

Please, we need a change!!!
.
.

2007-02-27 16:38:52 · answer #3 · answered by ccguy 3 · 1 1

It is a vast left wing conspiricy to assure a democratic victory in 08. I am sure of it. Yahoo is responsible for the election of more democrats in congress an a democratic president. It is not the failed policys, of the corrupt and criminal Bush administation or the obstuctionest policys of the Repuglicans in the Senate at all. I blame Bill Clinton for everything.

2007-02-27 16:46:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

hiow does she take care of the country when she can't take care of her personal life maybe she doesnt care so much what he does or what people say she could get rid of him or get her a someone to not have sex with (she may know the difference even if he didn't) if she is as smart as people say why has she lived with a he w----- all of these years.I think she is just playing the people for fools.I think she is two faced and self centered

2007-02-27 16:52:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i find that hillary clinton is way to conservative for me! i need someone who is actually liberal as opposed to not reactionary like the current administration.

2007-02-27 16:44:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

the only answer I can offer is that this conservative had my yahoo email, yahoo personals ripped away from me for no apparently good reason!!! color me interested now, too!

2007-02-27 23:51:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers