2007-02-27 16:20:05 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You are so funny!!!!!!!
2007-02-27 16:53:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
OK i dont support Bush but you should honestly check the facts.... the dow has been at an all time high the past few weeks repeatedly breaking the record.... it may have plummeted 400 points but that was to be expected.. if you see it climbing and climbing you should know some time it WILL FALL.... and the stock is still up 1600 points in the last year and around 100 in the last 3 months after what happened today... not to mention its about to shoot right back up around 200 points this week
2007-02-28 00:25:27 · answer #2 · answered by jagjam37 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A single day decline in the stock market is really irrelevant in the entire economic picture. Now if the stock market declines a couple thousand over the next year, that might be a big deal. This was nothing more than a correction for overinflated stock prices.
2007-02-28 00:27:26 · answer #3 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, you're right. I happen to know the President was personally responsible. Keith Olbermann told me so. He said the president called Wall Street and TOLD them to make the market go down. Yes, I'm sure you're right.
After all, everyone knows they just sit in the White House all day long sipping coffee and flipping a coin to decide whether they'll tell Wall St to make the markets rise or fall. Isn't that how it goes?
2007-02-28 00:27:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
saw it coming just like i saw the enron debacle. the market was overdue for a correction and will probably fall another 150pts tomorrow until gaining some ground on friday. overall the correction will start the slide back towarded 12k. high oil prices this summer will lead a bull market again , but consumers will again tAke it in the rear while the oil companies reap heavy profits. this is why i dont care to take in the market anymore and like to stick my money on securities and mutual funds. they are alot safer and wont give you a coronary keeping up with their gains/losses!!
2007-02-28 00:49:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's the economy. It's foreign policy. It's being able to pronounce nuclear (and sorry). Does he really have any supporters left? Good neo-con's don't ask questions, they just drink the Kool-aid.
2007-02-28 00:26:39 · answer #6 · answered by Goofy Foot 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It was related to the market in China! Had nothing to do with our economy.
2007-02-28 00:27:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh no! A little hiccup in the stock market! Besides,economists say it's nothing to worry about!
2007-02-28 00:24:00 · answer #8 · answered by Bunz 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hey, Bozo.
Presidents don't have that much influence on the stock market. World trade, particularly from emerging economies, does.
Bush's tax breaks probably saved the U.S. economy in the wake of the 9-11 crisis.
Back to the circus.
2007-02-28 00:23:59 · answer #9 · answered by Warren D 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Yes. I can also say with certainty that you are another one of Nancy/Jazmine's et al numerous Yahoo IDs. You all are starting to decompensate. I think it so cute the way all of you answer each other's questions.
2007-02-28 07:43:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can say that it is a terrible idea to gloat over a falling stock market. I can say that is stupid.
2007-02-28 00:25:26 · answer #11 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋