2007-02-27 15:33:23 · 11 answers · asked by samta_clause 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
As far as i know lesnar is the only one with amateur experience. he is quite athletic, very limber and super quick. i like batista, but he wouldnt be a match for lesnar. sid never really impressed me with his skills. he was huge, and somewhat athletic, but in a shoot-style/ grecco roman style, ground grappling match i couldnt see him being competition for lesnar.
2007-02-27 16:16:56 · answer #1 · answered by martinsmailbox 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brock Lesnar... I Think WWE Made A Big Mistake By Letting Him Go... Twice. I Think If He Would've Stayed Around He Would've Been A Huge Star Like The Rock Or Steve Austin
2007-02-27 23:37:59 · answer #2 · answered by Chrisss793 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Brock Lesnar would win because he's the only one with amateur wrestling skills (that would work on Sid) and power (on Batista). Lesnar is also the quickest of the three so that favors him as well.
2007-02-28 11:36:51 · answer #3 · answered by RichMac82 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sid doesn't care about winning... He just likes to piss people off and dominate. He rarely wins because he gets a bigger pop when he loses. Lesnar will make batista look like a rookie so I would go with The next big thing.
2007-02-27 23:39:20 · answer #4 · answered by fastfreedombailbonds 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Batista
2007-02-28 01:39:46 · answer #5 · answered by dani ng 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are all good! i would root for batista, but i know he's gonna loose to brock lesnar.
2007-02-27 23:48:26 · answer #6 · answered by k 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sycho Sid. Period. End of conversation.
2007-02-28 03:04:11 · answer #7 · answered by no more heroes 2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lesnar. For all the above reasons and more.
2007-02-28 11:46:24 · answer #8 · answered by atlas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sid vicious
2007-02-28 13:01:21 · answer #9 · answered by random at its finest 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is NO competition.... Sid would put them in the dirt!!!!
2007-02-27 23:41:49 · answer #10 · answered by gabster 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋