English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

nash or kobe

2007-02-27 15:28:22 · 15 answers · asked by Rickyxlnos 2 in Sports Basketball

15 answers

Nash no doubt. Kobe himself admits he's hard to play with and even though he's brilliant, chemistry is an issue. Nash however is exactly the opposite, a glue guy who can bring people together

2007-02-27 16:21:57 · answer #1 · answered by #15mwu 5 · 0 0

Kobe Bryant. First, look at the age, Kobe Bryant is younger. With Kobe Bryant, you have somone who can do everything and everything well. Steve Nash can only pass and shoot the ball. Steve Nash MUST have good three point shooters and cutters with him, and if I am building a team, Kobe Bryant would make his teammates better. Sure Steve Nash could run a better show, but Kobe would build a better franchise.

2007-02-27 17:48:21 · answer #2 · answered by gogo2disco 2 · 0 0

As much as i hate Nash i would have to build my team around him over kobe. Kobe only has the abilty to take a game over by scoring alot. While Nash as the ablity to drop 30 points on a team but will still dish out 10 plus assist to during the game. Nash simply makes every player on his team better but giving them amazingly easy shots.

2007-02-27 15:39:00 · answer #3 · answered by dirk 1 · 0 0

If we have to pick between Nash or Kobe I pick Nash. Nash makes everyone around him better and by a lot.

However, picking on my own I would likely take Dwight Howard. He is a dominant force at center and only has 3 years of experience. I forgot to mention he is only 22. A center like this guy only comes along once in awhile and his team usually wins a lot. It is really too bad Orlando can't pull this off, or at least hasn't pulled it off yet.

I also would not mind building a team around Dirk Nowitzki.

2007-02-27 16:30:19 · answer #4 · answered by bears_fan_54@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0 0

Nash. Simply because, Kobe will hog the ball no matter who is on his team. Nash will make everyone on his team better. Having a world class point guard is easier for a team, as they're hard to come by.

2007-02-27 15:41:21 · answer #5 · answered by jamesjia1989 1 · 1 0

NASH!!!
It's critical for a basketball team to have an excellent point guard - to orchestrate the plays, dictate the tempo of the game, provide court leadership, etc. With a floor general like Nash, putting points on the board will not be a problem so long as the leather is distributed well among the guys on the court.

2007-02-27 16:42:19 · answer #6 · answered by DC Fanatic 4 · 0 0

Kobe but only because he's a little younger and Nash is starting to fall apart physically but if it was only for a year or to it would have to be Nash.

2007-02-27 15:34:18 · answer #7 · answered by donaldjasonblair 4 · 0 0

Nash

2007-02-27 15:32:00 · answer #8 · answered by Reptar 4 · 1 0

Nash

2007-02-27 15:31:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'd definitely say Nash over Kobe, because he can make players around him better--Kobe cannot and does not do that.

2007-02-27 16:05:53 · answer #10 · answered by TC 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers