I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist, and correct me if I’m wrong, but so many diseases were cured in the first half of the last century with so much less technology than we have today.
2007-02-27 15:02:48 · 10 answers · asked by Walter D 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I think your absolutely correct, and i'm usually the first one to knock some sense into a goofy conspiracy theorist :)
2007-02-27 15:09:38 · answer #1 · answered by TJ815 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they do. The individual scientist, and the company working on the cure would love to have his fame and fortune forever etched in history as the ones who cured whatever.
They would make more money curing it than they will treating it. Imagine if every person had to take the aids cure like a vaccine. Thats alot more doses than the small % of the population that gets infected. And if it was curable people would not try avoding it so they could treat more people and many more than once just like we do ghonorhea and syphyllus today.
The reason we had success with so many diseases in the past century, was that all those diseases were similar, and thus similarly treated. Most were bacteria, treated with antibiotics. Others were simple viruses and treated with vaccines. What is left are the diseases that attack the body differently and thus must have new types of cures.
2007-02-27 15:20:37 · answer #2 · answered by Ron B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they want to find a cure.
I guess you didn't think that maybe the easy to cure diseases were cured first.
The easy things are always the first things. You may as well ask why it takes so long to build a modern 100+ story skyscraper when in the past they could build 5 story buildings in much shorter time.
2007-02-27 15:14:47 · answer #3 · answered by David V 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it is not a conspirators theory at all, drug company's make billions off of sick people. I cannot speak of aids or cancer, never experienced it, however I can speak of diabetes's, If they found a cure for diabetes instead of treating it, they would lose billions. My drug bill alone is around $400 a month, multiply that by the 15 or 20 million people that are diagnosed in the U.S. and the many millions more globally and you can see why they never want to cure anything. It is another example of corporate greediness, but they have all the guns, the people have none and until it is not profitable they will continue to rape the people.
2007-02-27 15:12:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I understand maximum cancers biology highly on the molecular factor. i can say for a shown actuality that there is not any individual remedy to maximum cancers highly that. at the same time as there are similarities in antigen mutation in HIV/AIDS adn maximum cancers cells, they are actually distinct. you received't locate a offical source disputing any decision therapy. it truly is like the argument that "God " exists because you won't be able to disprove it. by that good judgment, something from flying spaghetti monsters to invisible pink unicorns exist. There must be a sensible reason at the back of the mechanism of action. If no longer, there is not any reason to think about it. There are a lengthy way too many quite some remedies with out reason at the back of their interest. all of them won't be able to be correct. extra probable, they are all incorrect!!!! the purely moron is you for believing that cr*p. the purely jack*ss you for criticizing non-beligerent honest questions.
2016-10-17 09:26:11 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
aids was a conspiracy to begin with dont even get me started!! the oklahoma city bombing years ago... they had the cure for aids in the basement. the cure for the same disease that they created!! initially the government created aids/hiv to stop homosexuality in the usa. but they failed! ahhhh u got me started to vent now... did u know that the princess diana died because she BLEED TO DEATH on the curb WAITING for medical attention?? she bleed out of a small vessel in the lung (pulmonary artery) over 2 hours!!!! they told her to "wait there princess!!" and thought she was just an intoxicated princess!! i'm in california, and the medical system here...we get ppl seriously injured in car accidents to the hosp and in the surgery room within one hour!!! if u get shot and you still alive... we will get u to operating room within an hour even if u go unconscious. ONE HOUR!! not sit there and bleed to death princess!!! ahhhhhh sorry lol
2007-02-27 15:52:50 · answer #6 · answered by firemedic311 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. The plan is to TREAT disease. Not CURE disease. No money in cures.
2007-02-27 15:08:01 · answer #7 · answered by chi_guys_gay_lover 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
are you kidding me? DISEASES = DRUGS and DRUGS = MONEY. who'd want to give up a deal like that?
2007-02-27 15:37:01 · answer #8 · answered by AM 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, there is no money in cures,,,and that is ALL they care about.!!!!!
2007-02-27 19:20:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
2007-02-27 15:08:33 · answer #10 · answered by Dingo B 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋