Hunters and gatherers lived mobile and very low nutritious lives.
"Nutritious" doesn't sound right.
Does nutritional sound better?
2007-02-27 13:41:56 · 6 answers · asked by Arnold 4 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
There is no such thing as a nutritious life, nor a mobile life for that matter. Use the word lifestyles instead.
2007-02-27 13:52:12 · answer #1 · answered by I'm Not 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hunters and gatherers lived nomadic lives (nomadic means they moved a lot, that is, mobile) which resulted in them have a fairly rigid diet lacking in all the nutrients they needed.
Hunters and gathers migrated often, resulting in a narrow diet not containing all the nuturents they needed.
2007-02-27 22:10:55 · answer #2 · answered by Curious 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Try "Hunters and Gatherers lived very mobile lives with limited access to a variety of foods."
2007-02-27 21:47:36 · answer #3 · answered by the beet 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
hunter-gatherers were very mobile. their diets were low in nutrients.
OR
due to living a highly mobile existence, the diets of hunter-gatherers were low in vital nutrients. (make sure that this is a factual statement if you use it!)
OR
due to high mobility, the diets of hunter-gatherers lacked vital nutrients.
2007-02-27 21:56:48 · answer #4 · answered by soulsista 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would re-word it:
Hunters and gatherers lived nomadic lives, their diet being very low in nutrition.
.
2007-02-28 00:25:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nutrient or nourishment.
The lives of hunters and gatherers were very mobile and low in nourishment.
2007-02-27 21:50:49 · answer #6 · answered by sharon b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋