English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When I listen to his speeches, he often mentions how future generations will look back at this one and ask why didn't we do something?

That and being so sure there were WMD's in Iraq?

Is that not what a person who suffers from Delustions of Granduer think?

Paranoia schizophrenia perhaps?

2007-02-27 12:43:40 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

Nah, I am just another Shmuck sitting behind a computer gabbing about nonsense. Just wasting time.

2007-02-27 12:52:15 · update #1

can a.
No, but I do.

2007-02-27 13:03:55 · update #2

12 answers

i truly believe that what he is doing he believes is the right thing he thinks that he is 100% right no ifs ands or doubts no matter what the rest of the world thinks so i guess i would say yes

2007-02-27 12:58:10 · answer #1 · answered by wildrice64 4 · 1 1

No, he was sent by the illuminati to control the people. He was sent to rule the country, as a fake front for illuminati rule. He rigged the elections and was a phony. Bush went to Iraq to benefit large corporations. It was all fake

2014-03-05 23:20:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

dont worry about it. as long as the pelosi ites are in charge its a moot point..the future will be bleak so this is perhaps all optimism. no bush suffers from reality, not grandeur, that the pelosi ites cannot hope to understand and the obvious reason why we dont do anything is liberals.

2007-02-27 20:47:48 · answer #3 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 0

Where did you get your Doctorate? He was sure, of WMD's, because that is what he was told. Well, so was Congress. SO I guess they suffer too. Now that Congress has said they will continue to back him, does that mean that they too or off their trolley?

2007-02-27 20:52:34 · answer #4 · answered by Jim R 4 · 2 0

For those who think bush administration didn't lie about WMD.

Mr. President, today the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has released to the public two of the five sections of our long-promised report on how intelligence was used by policymakers in the lead-up to the war in Iraq. This phase II report builds on the committee's July 2003 phase I report on the intelligence community's very substantial mistakes regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Fundamentally, these reports are about accountability. They are about identifying the mistakes that led us to war and making sure those mistakes never happen again, so far as we can do so.

The committee's investigation into prewar intelligence on Iraq has revealed that the Bush administration's case for war in Iraq was fundamentally misleading.Prior to the war, administration officials repeatedly characterized Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs in more conclusive and threatening terms than were substantiated by the underlying intelligence assessments. Analytical assessments of the intelligence
community that were not in line with the more strident administration view on alleged Iraqi links to al-Qaida and the 9/11 plot were ignored and were denigrated by senior policymakers. Most disturbingly, the administration, in its zeal to promote public opinion in the United States before toppling Saddam Hussein, pursued a deceptive strategy prior to the war of using intelligence reporting that the intelligence community warned was uncorroborated, unreliable, and, in critical instances, fabricated. The committee has uncovered information in its investigation which shows that the administration ignored warnings prior to the war about the veracity of the intelligence trumpeted publicly to support its case that Iraq was an imminent threat to the security of the United States. Some of the false information used to support the invasion of Iraq was provided by the Iraqi National Congress, the INC, an organization which our intelligence agencies had cautioned repeatedly was penetrated by hostile intelligence services and would use its relationship with the United States to promote its own agenda to overthrow Saddam Hussein. The committee's investigation concluded that the INC attempted to influence U.S. policy on Iraq by providing false information through Iraqi defectors directed at convincing the United States that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and had links to terrorists.
The committee also found the July 2002 decision by the National Security Council directing that the renewed funding of the INC contract--the Iraqi National Congress, the Chalabi operation--be put under Pentagon management was ill advised given the counterintelligence concerns of the CIA and warnings of financial mismanagement from the State Department. Repeated prewar statements by administration officials sought to connect Iraq and al-Qaida in ways the underlying intelligence simply did not support.

2007-02-27 21:05:08 · answer #5 · answered by paul b 1 · 0 3

Nope, that's a democratic affliction!

2007-02-27 22:14:44 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 2 0

grand delusions, very grand. its almost like he is a cocaine abusing alcoholic who has a vice president that has a lesbian daughter. he claims God told him to bomb brown people, but his God offered nary a word about actual absence of wmd ( if you did not live in America like me, you did not suck propaganada for 8 months and knew that the neo cons were selling a load of bs ). I find this remarkable, its almost like it was satan guiding him and not God at all.

2007-02-27 21:08:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Your thoughts, are my thoughts, exactly.
Might want to throw desperation in there.

2007-02-27 20:49:49 · answer #8 · answered by Calee 6 · 0 2

Funny that you say that, read # 2 on this page:
http://duggmirror.com/health/8_diseases_that_give_you_superhuman_powers/

2007-02-27 20:53:52 · answer #9 · answered by Alex F 2 · 0 2

no i had bad advise thats all

2007-02-27 20:54:19 · answer #10 · answered by Shark 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers