To me, The Miz and The Great Khali are a toss-up, but ultimately, I might say The Great Khali might be just a tiny but better since he's 7ft 3 in. and over 420lbs.
And how much better of a choice do you think one of those guys would've been over Bobby Lashley?
2007-02-27 12:40:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
If I had the choice, I would put Great Khali against Umaga. If Vince McMahon likes big guys wrestling, then these two would be the perfect choices for a match. The Miz vs. Umaga? Umaga would beat the Miz down until there was nothing left of him.
2007-02-27 12:44:19 · answer #1 · answered by ironchain15 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uh, the Miz would be a great pick for Trump if he was looking to lose his hair on the spot. Khali would've been a great choice except he can barely move so Umaga would stomp him into the ground once he got Khali down.
2007-02-28 03:48:01 · answer #2 · answered by RichMac82 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Frankly, I was hoping Trump would've picked Khali because I was expecting Bobby Lashley to defend the ECW title @ Wrestlemania. Oh.....and The Miz, come on......that's a retarded choice.
2007-02-27 13:00:23 · answer #3 · answered by WheelchairBA 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
khali would own lashley miz and umaga in a 3 on 1 handicap
2007-02-27 12:49:33 · answer #4 · answered by austacution 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The miz is the most worthless piece crap. he looks ******* retarded with his gay azz mohawk and he acts gay and hes not good at wrestling
The Great Khali is the second worst wrestler behind the Miz. All he is is big, and if you watch him he can barely walk.
Bobby Lashley has the biggest Lats and Traps in Wrestling History which makes him baller
2007-02-27 12:47:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I trust some. i'm going to provide this a 6/10. this is why: the 1st situation is Kane isn't even stated. he's one among Smackdown's optimal, and would surely be in WM27. I additionally think of that Michael Tarver could get replaced with Gabriel. He has a meaner look to him, and extra acceptable wrestling skills (watch his YouTube video clips). additionally, you're able to many identify unification fits. If this have been to take place, WWE would be in various difficulty as one practice would have the U. S. & IC, and the different would have the main titles, or one practice would have the two. finally, i'm no longer a great fan of the communities you made for the tag identify tournament. Now, the good area. i like the belief of Undertaker vs. Cena, even in spite of the undeniable fact that area of me thinks WWE would enable SuperCena win. in spite of the undeniable fact that, if this did take place, it would provide Cena the appropriate possibility for a heel turn. i like the assertion team additionally, and the belief of Goldberg coming decrease back, in spite of the undeniable fact that it may be against somebody extra generic then Sheamus. The 5-7 fits sound good besides. BQ: in all possibility, basically because of the fact i like WrestleMania.
2016-12-14 07:14:08 · answer #6 · answered by livesay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great Khali by a mile would have been better but Lashley is good too.
2007-02-27 12:46:11 · answer #7 · answered by aj121994 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Great Khali would not stand a chance against Umaga...
2007-02-27 13:33:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would be terrible for them to pick anybody,2 reasons. 1 because if they pick great khali he is going to destroy all the good guys and the fans wont like it and ratings will go WAY down. 2 because Miz sucks. :-l
2007-02-27 12:47:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bobby Lashley all the way!!!!! Who is more "on fire" than Lashley? I mean, the guy is ECW World Champion and has beaten everyone in his path.
2007-02-27 13:13:10 · answer #10 · answered by gtang09 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋