siding with Clinton on the largest tax increase in us history
siding with Gore on the tiebreaking vote to tax social security breaking a fifty year promise to the nations elderly.
siding with Clinton on taking credit for welfare reform when in fact the only welfare reform was from the contract with america.
siding with Nancy Pelosi on 757gate so that the taxpayers could pay for her campaign junkets to San Francisco...(refuleing stop...puhlease).
siding with al gore on the ridiculous miami/dade do over.
siding with hillary clinton on a botched attempt to nationalize the health care system and create a mess not unlike canada's.
the point here is as long as he understands mistakes...why not admit to some legitimate ones instead of trying to play the poltical correctness card when its really not necessary. real apologies for real mistakes are much more valuable than faux ones.
2007-02-27 12:29:46 · 8 answers · asked by koalatcomics 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
you got that right!
2007-02-27 13:23:29 · answer #1 · answered by patriot07 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) tax increase - he did the right thing. Clinton wiped out the defecit. Bush has plunged our grandchildren into crippling debt so that his richest friends could double their net worth
2) social security taxation - probably yes
3) welfare is the faux subject - it costs the country almost NOTHING compared to a DAY in Iraq. We shouldn't even be wasting our time talking about it. What both Clinton and the contract with america was a horrible thing to do to the poorest americans
4) 757-gate has been proven to be a stupid accusation
5) Gore won Florida - Edwards should apologize for not working HARDER
6) health care - YES - Hillary's bill was awful and benefitted only the for-profit insurance companies. Canada's system works, and costs less than the US "system" in administrative costs. you have your facts very wrong on this.
7) He was right to apologize for a vote that helped kill 3100 US soldiers and 600,000 Iraqis, most of them civilians
2007-02-27 12:38:28 · answer #2 · answered by firefly 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Didn't he also help kill some potentially good soldiers and citizens by supporting abortions? He has a lot to apologize for. Why start with this one? Just another flip flop I guess.
2007-02-27 12:40:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, that's what apologies are for. People can make mistakes, but they must admit and correct right away. That's the rule of life.
What do you need to apologize for?
2007-02-27 13:27:34 · answer #4 · answered by ToYou,Too! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He sounds like the antichrist, not unlike our current president. Now I want to vote for him just to pizz you off.
2007-02-27 14:25:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because the democras think that they should pullout if repulicans stay in lut can't say pullout if they voted to go in what a mess of lyes
2007-02-27 13:16:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
only if he was a republican - the democrats don't have to apologize for anything.....
2007-02-27 12:34:42 · answer #7 · answered by Marysia 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes, why not?
2007-02-27 12:37:35 · answer #8 · answered by MJ 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋