north korea, they have already set one off
2007-02-27 12:29:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jim B 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
the United States is most deadly
then Russia
Iran and North Korea are way down the list, they don't even have working nuclear weapons the US and Russia had in the 1940s
Neither Iran nor North Korea are a threat to the USA
2007-02-27 12:34:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by anonacoup 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
make no mistake they are both deadly.but now NORTH KOREA BECAUSE of its nuclear program are more of a threat.IRAN is very much a threat and are up to their eyeballs inguilt in IRAQ right now they are supplying the insurgency in IRAQ and have been all along they are responsible for dragging this war out and for the loss of AMERICAN and IRAQI lives as well as our allies.IRAN is not playing games butthey may be trying to distract us from a real threat- NORTH KOREA they are in this together dont doubt it.if i were PRESIDENT i would have serious talks with these nations and see what we could agree on and work from there.but i would never compromise the safety and well beingof our military or our AMERICAN citizens living anywhere in the world or our core values.sometimes hard choices must be made when that happens you must win,you cannot halfway do the job,we must win.
2007-02-27 12:37:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by dixie58 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Neither of them pose the slightest threat to the U.S. until the U.S. President all of a sudden deens one or the other an imediate threat, or creditable threat or what ever depending for what reason he is directing the media attention /distracting other events or saving his sorry as butt and American Supremecy, which should have been done nice and easy with American repution more or less intact by that I mean we were never Angels, and aways selfishly pursued our corperate interates globaly. The standard M.O. was subvert democracy and self determination install a dictator with a junta trained in Fort something in Georgia. Insure business freindly to U.S. conditions in country become horrendous as elite few live in obnoxios luxury and the masses become subjected to unimaginable poverty as U.S. insists that national water, electricity be privitived of course. then they refuse to do the things the government did , such as supply the rural areas with these services (not cost effective) That is why some things should never be privitized. Heaven forbid we factor in human needs as governments (not corrupted by corporate money) should do. Anyways the total imcompatence, the unconcern for the daily slaughter of up to 700,000 innocents by 3 years just to keep Iraq from trading oil in Euros. Iran understood this and did not object. After 3 years of listening to insincere reteric from Bush/Cheney Iran president with no more stomache for slaughter and know end in sight said Iran was thinking of using Euros to sell oil even number on allies after U.S. started after Iran had enough and said they to might go the way of the Euro. None of these countries wanted to hurt the U.S. dollar they are all to heavey invested. Arrogance , Hubris, sociopath behavior on our part forced their hands...Mary.
2007-02-27 12:58:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by mary57whalen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran hasn't attacked a country for HUNDREDS of years ,they defend themselves ONLY.and their honest people. we on the other hand have attacked MANY MANY country's in the past couple of hundred years.all this about them is propaganda so we will have an excuse to attack them and they only wish to have power. for electricity.hell the Israelis have a hundred nukes but the Iranians cant have them,? and they say they only wish too have power,anyway. we don't have a right to say they cant have power Y'all.They have not attacked anyone, leave those people alone I say.If we attack Iran ,Russia will step in and theirs going to be a war of civilizations.The American war machine wishes war, half our taxes go to the military, that way to much money of OURS being spent and they want more so they can make more money. I don't like it, I have a right to say I don't want war, we should stop being a warring country.I demand Peace, stop with the killing . we should be a peaceful country, under GOD.
do we really wish to have nukes going off in American city's? lets stop trying to attack what ever country we just feel like attacking.were not supposed to be that kind of people .
and n Korea ain't nothing at all to worry about,
2007-02-27 12:49:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Right now: North Korea
But if Iran gets the bomb or if the Koreans sell them one, they WILL use it. No doubt. Kim Jong probably won't use it except as a last resort.
If he ever gets that missile to work that can supposedly hit Alaska, however... I'd definitely give him some serious 6-party talks for that.
2007-02-27 12:31:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by samurai champloo 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Both nations have the soveriegn right to arm and protect themselves, and I find them both to be highly entertaining in their abilities to rattle the cages of the uninformed.
Personally, I am far more worried about the rouge nation of Israel and the sleeping monster that is China.
If I was President I would ignore them both. They mean nothing to our national security in the big picture. We should be concentrating on finding those responsible for attacking us on Sept 11 and to hell with everyone else.
2007-02-27 12:35:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
north korea, can not mess up. The thouch the US it will effect chinas economy and china is the only country giving them food right now. Iran is more deadly right now.
2007-02-27 12:30:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Iran because they have grudges, an ideology of hate, millions of co-haters, tons of money/oil, a working economy and nobody like china to step on them if they try and do something stupid.
2007-02-27 12:54:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither, it's been totally blown out of proportion just like iraq was, if anyone is a threat it's the russians under putin
2007-02-27 12:40:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Nick F 6
·
0⤊
0⤋