2007-02-27 11:54:41 · 12 answers · asked by yasi 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
the usa needs to focus on problems here instead of trying to save the world..sad as situations are in other countries the focus needs to be here and helping our own citizens
2007-02-27 12:06:45 · answer #1 · answered by charmel5496 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i totally agree with the herb guy that answered this question. Yeah darfur is important but they are NOT threatening our lives and the lives of everyone else in our country. I'm sure that they can become a priority later once we kick iraqs butt.
2007-02-27 13:22:07 · answer #2 · answered by This Girl :) 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
human beings in simple terms favor some thing to gripe about.we are there for oil notwithstanding. The Bush administration handpicked the applicants for Iraq's parliamentary elections and presented a niche on the ballots with the settlement that the elected officials would conform to have there forex issuing rights placed to a private monetary agency (imperative monetary agency of Iraq) it really is fantastically very like our Federal Reserve monetary agency. The imperative monetary agency of Iraq makes use of u.s. forex to diminish back up the Iraq new Iraq Dinar.for each 1200 or so dinar there's a minimum of one million American dollar bill sitting interior the vaults of the imperative monetary agency of u.s.. President Bush wanted this that way the Iraq would ought to convey American money into there monetary equipment with the intention to save the monetary equipment going and enable the imperative monetary agency of Iraq to print and private loan extra money into the monetary equipment. And the in effortless words way Iraq can create extra money for there human beings is to promote there Oil to u.s. by the american dollar. u.s. will earnings in this because the oil will be more affordable because the substitute costs would not prepare and then Iraq's imperative monetary agency would have extra money to print out and subsequently arising a booming monetary equipment in Iraq and providing affordable oil for u.s.. If the oil production ever starts in case you question me if y'all are prevailing i'd say so.i have not met a soldier yet that say were dropping so save up the reliable job. It truly would not count number if the warfare turned right into a mistake we would besides look at it as a destiny funding for out united states of america and mankind.Your providing freedom for Iraq's and monetary prosperity for the individuals decrease back residing house
2016-12-05 01:05:57 · answer #3 · answered by cutburth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the military are not there to be do-gooders. How is our national interest served by intervention there? Iraq is a high-risk proposition, and it's produced a litany of missed opportunities, but at least we have interests (and not oil, I wish people would get over that) in Iraq.
2007-02-27 12:21:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the Darfur attacks us like Saddam did then they’ll be next on our list.
2007-02-27 12:04:21 · answer #5 · answered by Herb 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but Darfur has no rich oil fields.
2007-02-27 11:58:50 · answer #6 · answered by mspicer0005 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but Darfur does not have oil or wealth. Kind of like RWANDA
2007-02-27 12:28:20 · answer #7 · answered by sasa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i was the one that answered ur question about the song "dancin".... just wondering if u live in california? people who like house music are hard to find! LOL! hit me up.
and yes the US is ALWAYS focused on sum bullsh**, rather than the REAL important issues. Jack azz George is president.... that should explain it right there. LOL!
2007-02-28 08:12:23 · answer #8 · answered by Kimber Gem 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree, The things happening in Darfur are much more important, and our troops and government barley do anything.
2007-02-27 11:59:28 · answer #9 · answered by luckygirl13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why, we can't be the policeman of the whole world, we have enough to do in Iraq, and Iran.
2007-02-27 12:16:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋