Ethics of Performance enhancing drugs?

Question

What are the ethics on Performance enhancing drugs?

Answer 1

OK, I'll play Devil's Advocate and say there is a considerable grey area on the issue of performance enhancing drugs. For example, caffeine is a stimulant and therefore can be classified as a drug. Now, many companies provide coffee free of charge to their employees, evidently because the caffeine stimulus improves their work. Can it be argued that this is unethical, i.e. are the companies doping their employees?

Granted, steroid use is much more serious than a caffeine addiction, but let's be realistic on how dangerous steroid use actually is. We know for a fact that a lot of high school athletes are taking steroids, and, contrary to impressions you may have, most of them do not incur permanent health problems by using them. Some will even argue the steroids make them less prone to injury. Overuse is quite dangerous, of course, but the same could be said of most legal drugs.

To ask a hypothetical question, imagine you are a very good football player with a strong chance to land a Division One scholarship, possibly even a professional career. However, you also know how tough the competition is to reach this level - something to enhance your perfornance could be the difference between landing or not landing that scholarship. We are talking about tens of thousands of dollars at minimum, and potentially millions. So, aware of the potential health risks, do you roll the dice and take the drugs? What do you think?

Let me be very clear: I am not endorsing the use of steroids. I am just saying that I can see this issue from the kid's point of view.

Answer 2

on the single hand, Ripken and Gwynn don't greater healthful the profile because of fact neither grow to be a great slugger (even nonetheless Ripken performed 'ninety two onward interior the bandbox of Camden Yards), the two did have spikes around the enhance 12 months of 'ninety 3 (as somebody else till now reported), and, besides the undeniable fact that Ripken had some injuries late in his occupation, after the streak ended, Gwynn by no potential extremely did. Ripken grow to be lots like Al Kaline: besides the undeniable fact that he performed in a hitters' park, and ended up with around 4 hundred homers, he grow to be greater of a singles-doubles hitter, and ended up with 3,000 occupation hits. As did Gwynn, who grow to be greater of a Rod Carew and Wade Boggs type interior the way he hit: infrequently any homers, yet plenty and much and many singles. And Gwynn has positioned on quite a few weight, which is going against the steroid profile -- and likewise has me in touch. Tony, bear in mind what got here approximately to Kirby Puckett: Have some salads and grains, guy! on the different hand, the two adult men did bypass bald extremely early of their careers. No, i do no longer think of the two grow to be a steroid consumer. however the undeniable fact that Brady Anderson wasn't on the Mitchell record checklist makes it fantastically suspect itself. The irony of the Gehrig remark is that, sooner or later, somebody might decide that steroids may well be used as a therapy for the ailment that bears Gehrig's call. It does no longer ask your self me in any respect.

Answer 3

There are no ethics of these drugs. They are steroids and such that cause the body to do things it was not intended to do. There are way too many side-effects of these drugs to ever consider legalizing them. Using these drugs is a form of cheating. It is just wrong.