should nudist be allowed walk around out and about in the nude?

Answer 1

Personally I couldnt care less, but I'm sure someone out there will find a way to be offended by the mere suggestion of it.

Answer 2

No I think that whatever a person chooses to do in their homes fine but I dont think going out naked in public is a good idea. This opens up the person to all sorts of abuse and accusations. I used to work at a leisure centre where there was and as far as I know still is a regular sunday evening Naturists swim session. I never ever saw them it was all behind the closed doors of the pool. But to the lifeguards they were some of the weirdest people ever. Some make an issue of it and travel up and down the country without clothes on and waste valuable pollice and court time by being arrested at every place they go through. No I am afraid I can think of far more negatives than positives for this question.

Answer 3

HELL NO!!!! Trust me, I'm a nudist. I respect the social mores of the communities I live, work, or traverse through. And besides, if I could be nude all the time, and flaunt it, what's to stop other folk from doing things I "object" to? Churches, temples, etc are for religion. Bathrooms are for you know what.

Private property should be the place for your privates...

Answer 4

Sure, if they are in an area where it is customary and kosher to be nude. At a nudist resort, go for it. In the middle of JFK airport, not such a good plan.

Answer 5

It depends on the situation.

In the privacy of your home & garden, why not? If people choose to look over a high garden fence in to a private garden they then have no right to be "offended" by what they see, assuming nothing illegal is happening.

As for places like beaches & pools, again, why not? I just don't understand the obserdity of getting dressed to go in to water!

As for in general, though, I think no. Too many people in society couldn't cope with the idea and, especially in the UK, it's usually too cold!

Answer 6

Eh, I guess they should be _allowed_ to, but not to sit. And if they carry a towel everywhere (for sitting, basic nudist etiquette), wouldn't it really be more convenient to just wear some clothes? Then you also get pockets for your wallet, mobile, keys. Are shoes clothes? Definitely can't get by without those. Really, clothes do serve an important purpose.

Answer 7

sure, you may desire to be allowed to stroll around bare. In a loose u . s . a . you may desire to be waiting to do something that would not violate the rights of others. i do no longer see how your being bare violates anyones rights. regrettably the police possibly won't have the comparable perspective. I merchandise to seeing fat human beings (no count if clothed or bare) i think of they should not be allowed to stroll the streets because of the fact it violates my rights. this could seem a stupid arguement, although this is not any sillier than suggesting you're violating their rights by utilising being bare. after all guy is in simple terms an animal and this is organic for animals to be bare?

Answer 8

Well, we all are supposed to have the right to freedom of expression. So, it's OK, I suppose, but personally I am
more attracted to nice-looking people with their clothes on rather than in the nude.

Answer 9

Yes, but in this weather things might look a little smaller than usual.

Answer 10

Depends what they look like. They should have to get a babe license. No men should be allowed, only attractive women. Women I find attractive at that.