"But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand." (Isaiah 32:8)
2007-02-27 10:32:09 · 11 answers · asked by fireburn 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no it was wrote as a tribute to king james by the ruling church of england.
2007-02-27 10:36:15 · answer #1 · answered by J Q Public 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
King James I of England (VI of Scotland) says: "Yea, woe unto thee, dialecktickal materialists! For the axe lieth at the foot of the tree, even as the hammer of the industrial proletariat lieth at the economic base of the cultural superstructure. For verily, verily I say unto thee, the internal contradictions at the heart of a late-capitalist monetarist economy pierce the heart of the Son, and his cup runneth over with the blood of the workers."
2007-02-27 10:39:46 · answer #2 · answered by surroundedbyimbeciles 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it was written by the same people who wrote the real bible. You know, some drunken idiots sitting by a camp fire writing a lot of crap to try and trick some idiots who can't think for themselves so they have a book tell them what they should believe in.
2007-02-27 10:37:09 · answer #3 · answered by .o0O O0o. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Communism didn't exist when the King James version was written. I know your question was meant to inflame, but I'll answer seriously.
2007-02-27 10:38:01 · answer #4 · answered by David M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no the issue is the king of England and the catholic church of Rome. The version represents a change in direction for the christian faith.
2007-02-27 10:39:55 · answer #5 · answered by Pablo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who cares.
worry about the future of our econonmy and politics for our next generations rather than focusing on a debatable past
2007-02-27 10:35:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think you've been smoking some "Kind" James Bud.
2007-02-27 10:36:16 · answer #7 · answered by brickity hussein brack 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No the bible is against oppresion.
2007-02-27 10:34:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
certainly not secular progressives
2007-02-27 10:37:15 · answer #9 · answered by 79vette 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but it was very kind.
2007-02-27 10:35:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋