Nice going Nancy? She has maintained since that happened that he should be removed from all committees. The Democrats bowed to the Black Caucus, who protested loudly, that he was being penalized before any wrong doing was proven. She appointed him because that is her job, and she had to do so to calm the Black Caucus down. I don't think she liked it much, and I think she'll be vindicated when he is prosecuted and found guilty. When you are in charge, sometimes you have to take action you find reprehensible on the strength of opposition to what you wish to do. I don't blame Pelosi for this one, I blame the Black Caucus.
2007-02-27 10:17:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess the guy was promised a seat on that committee a long time ago. I don't know any other reason that the Dems would insist on giving him the spot. It was a really dumb move, didn't the Dems KNOW that if they did this, they would be criticized? Wasn't there anyone else able to fill the spot?
I don't think the guy has been found guilty of anything (yet), but I believe at least two people were indicted for bribing him. Do the Democrats WANT to start a fight with the Republicans over this? Seems REALLY dumb to me... Love Jack
2007-02-27 18:09:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jack 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's funny, this question has been up for 5 minutes and no dems with some stupid retort. Thats because what can you say? It easy to say Bush is stupid, or republicans are ugly, or Bush should be impeached, but they can't defend William Jefferson or Nancy Pelosi.
2007-02-27 18:01:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Angelus2007 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
That on top of putting a man who doesn't know if Al Queda is predominantly Shiite or Sunni. So much for ending the culture of corruption.
2007-02-27 17:59:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Williams hasn't been charged with any crime, Cletus.
He will be fired if he is ever indicted or formally charged. In the meantime, try to keep your panties on.
2007-02-27 18:07:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by chimpus_incompetus 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
She's not worried, she knows he is being watched. Certainly more than Foley was watched or DeLay was watched.
Al Qaeda is or was headed by Osama Bin Laden whose family are buddies with the Saud and Bush families. Gee I wonder who would tell whom secrets about attacks etc.?
2007-02-27 18:00:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
LOL! "Oh,thank ya,Mr. Al-Qaeda man. We'll just stick this here moolah in one of your hookahs for safe keepin'. And btw Mr. Taliban man,are them hookahs disease free?"
2007-02-27 18:05:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by bugeyes 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
When was Jefferson charged with a crime? In a kangaroo court of numbskull neocons? He hasn't been, and won't be.
2007-02-27 18:01:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Pity she couldn't have had Abrahamoff find her somebody nice to appoint...
2007-02-27 17:59:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Blackacre 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
she should fire him
2007-02-27 18:00:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by impeachbushnoww 1
·
2⤊
1⤋