English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

WNBA.

I've never actually met anyone who went to a WNBA game.

2007-02-27 09:00:38 · answer #1 · answered by summit_of_human_intellect 3 · 0 0

The shootout is a awful thank you to compliment a recreation which could make or harm a communities playoff opportunities. how many circumstances has a team ignored the playoffs by one factor or ignored out on the grounds that they had a tie quite than a win? i think of they ought to have an entire 20 minute, extensive-unfold era length extra time. If no winner after that... grant the tie. allowing the shootout awards the team with the greater useful man or woman suited line scorers or a warm goalie. Hockey is a team recreation and can be desperate as a team. The NFL who has an analogous surprising dying OT would not decide for a 5 minute greater desirable quarter, they grant the completed 15 minute OT for determining a recreation. Baseball is going by finished extra innings (of course that difficulty is distinctive on account that in basic terms one team has of undertaking to attain at as quickly as.) I consider a prior poster. determining the sport with a shootout may well be the comparable as a house run derby, 3 factor opposition or ugh... a bypass, punt and kick opposition.

2016-11-26 19:25:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

WNBA. People like the NHL because there is violence and people fighting. On the other hand, one could enjoy a bunch of women running down the court and guarding eachother heavily... good question...

2007-02-27 09:00:37 · answer #3 · answered by the bertis 2 · 0 1

Nobody cares about neither of the 2, but NHL gets more, I'd say.

Unfortunately for women, women sports are not really big in the states.

2007-02-27 09:01:28 · answer #4 · answered by TheBosnian 2 · 0 0

Is there a difference?

2007-02-27 09:04:38 · answer #5 · answered by swomedicineman 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers