2007-02-27 08:51:44 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They do not justify simply killing the innocent. The United States government does all in its power to keep casualties to a minimum. However, when the enemy chooses to hide amongst civilians and strike at civilian targets. American forces do not seek out the innocent. Those damned 'insurgents' (terrorists) do.
2007-02-27 08:57:11 · answer #1 · answered by You Ask & I Answer!!! 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
We don't. That's why we oppose the insurgents and terrorists who are blowing them up.
You mean you didn't know that it ISN'T us who are killing the civilians, but that it is your beloved "freedom fighters" the insurgents who are killing them? Perhaps if you were more concerned about facts than spin, you'd have known this.
And while, yes, some innocent civilians have been killed due to our actions, In a war, innocent civilians will always suffer. But that should not stop anybody from realizing that removing Saddam was a greater good. He was a brutal and murderous dictator responsible for the murder of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Getting rid of him and his regime was a good goal. Some civilians died during this; lamentable, but unavoidable.
So, tell me if you think it is morally superior to ignore the plight of those suffering under Saddam, in his torture chambers - the girls and women in his rape rooms, the children in the prisons, and the innocent people being executed and murdered - as you people did? Do you believe it is moral to ignore the death and torture of thousands of innocent people? Does that really make for a clean conscience? I'd like to know.
2007-02-27 09:05:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason Democrats felt killing innocent civilians in Serbia was justified !
2007-02-27 08:57:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Why do democrats think the the American soldiers are killing innocent civilians?
Answer:
They seldom ever join the military so they just don't know squat.
It's the insurgents who are killing the civilians not the American soldiers. Our troops are there helping to keep the insurgents from killing the civilians but then, you are a democrat!
2007-02-27 09:16:49 · answer #4 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"The Iraqi civilian death count extensive sort is around 60,000" in accordance to a_wood80. That determine is an volume that he can sleep with. 60,000 harmless adult males, females and childrens slaughtered who had completed not something incorrect is okay in accordance to this guy. we could in basic terms say for a minute that it is not the 650,000 that's precise by skill of ways and envisioned by skill of communities on the floor counting in Iraq. yet we could in basic terms say that a_wood has a extra precise count extensive sort from his plush recliner. The determine of 60,000 nonetheless represents 9/11 circumstances 20. Or 9/11 repeated returned and returned returned in lets say those cities: long island l. a. Chicago Philadelphia Phoenix San Antonio San Diego Dallas San Jose Detroit Indianapolis Jacksonville San Francisco Columbus Austin Memphis Baltimore Washington D.C. Boston Denver If this happened we would be launching nukes at somebody no questions asked. yet you cons think of that's okay to take place to somebody else? those are the Christian values you declare to stand up for? What a set of hypocrites.
2016-10-16 21:54:23 · answer #5 · answered by didden 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Using that same logic you could say why did democrats think that killing innocent civilians in Japan in ww2 can be justified.
2007-02-27 09:35:35 · answer #6 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you talking about? Do you not read what is happening over there. The vast majority of deaths in Iraq right now are innocent civilians at the hands OF TERRORIST INSURGENTS.
2007-02-27 09:02:00 · answer #7 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who's trying to justify it. You libs act like it's a big game of RISK over there or something.
Do you suppose some japanese civilians died when your boy dropped those atomic bombs on them?
I know, I know nothing is worth fighting for especially the "evil" United States. Get over it!
2007-02-27 09:00:28 · answer #8 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Republicans are playing their role to make the "international community" realize that even a superpower like the U.S. can contribute to chaotic conditions in the middle east furthering the global government agenda. The whole bipartisan system is set up to divide the country between the rich and poor so that a global rule can be set into place with virtually no resistance because it will be presented as the solution to the problem. Republicans are playing the "bad guy" role. It's pretty elementary if you think about it.
2007-02-27 08:58:21 · answer #9 · answered by Gabriel Anton 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
im glad to see that some one here finally gets it.......... i mean since we accuse all republicans of a thaughtless war then i will also say that every muslim is a terrorist and every democrat is scared of their own shadow and wont make the tough decisions,and why not just say that every white person is a racist and everyblack person is a welfare recipient....come on get a clue you want to see the truth try pulling your head out of the sand most of the civilians that die over there dye by the terrorists own hands......get it staight
2007-02-27 09:05:13 · answer #10 · answered by David D 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋