Nuclear power would help a lot. Ethanol won't help very much because they have to use coal to make the Ethanol. Increasing Gas mileage in cares will be a little helpful but cars are not the #1 problem when it comes to global warming. Coal is the #1 problem.
2007-02-27 08:38:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't like Bush, yet i'd say that blaming him for a wild fireplace or causing a hurricane is in simple terms ridiculous. Blaming god would make extra experience. anyhow, the situations in California were ripe for a wild fireplace, extraordinarily with the nice and cozy Santa Ana winds. I lost my residing house 4 years in the past interior the wildfire interior an similar Lake Arrowhead section that burns lower back this time. I absolutely have in my opinion suffered, yet i'd not blame Bush for causing it. extraordinarily at the same time as a number of those fires were set by arsonists. the only which took my residing house turned right into a fireplace set by an arsonist. until eventually Bush became the arsonist, he's not in my opinion to blame.
2016-12-05 00:58:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by schiavone 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Bush is pushing Corn and Grasses for ethanol, neither of these have any hope of satisfying our energy hunger, they simply do not produce enough cellulose per acre. trees would be better as they out produce corn by 2.5 times. However, Hemp would fulfill our needs (4 times more cellulose per acre than trees). Hemp will require a 5% land commitment to grow enough fuel, trees 20% of rotating acreage or 50% for corn. 5% is possible, 50% is absurd.
2007-02-27 08:43:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Alan S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is doing what the American people will accept right now, but Al Gore sure doesn't practice what he preaches.
Gore burned through 22,619 kilowatt-hours of electricity at his house last August, a rate that is twice the level used by an average U.S. household in an entire year.
Gore's natural gas bills for his mansion and guest house averaged $1,080 per month last year.
“As the spokesman of choice for the global warming movement, Al Gore has to be willing to walk the walk, not just talk the talk, when it comes to home energy use," Tennessee Center for Policy Research President Drew Johnson said in a statement.
2007-02-27 08:38:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
man cannot do anything to stop global warming they can only mitigate the damage by not having children, cause like the fujita scale global waming is worse cause there will be more people to hurt.
And besides 430 years after Son of the God Most High (ie the Son of the LORD and His Goddess) all man will die. that means within 500 years of My birth everybody is dead and those incubators with frozen sperm and eggs will start churning out the new master race after your all dead. ha payback is a b*tch and this is one great science fiction story better then the bible.
2007-02-27 08:52:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush doesn't have ANY say into gas milage, that's the car manufacturers. Plus, global warming/cooling is a cycle. We just happen to be warming.
2007-02-27 08:37:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by bigsey93bruschi54 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I have always wondered with the hybrid cars, does the required electricity to charge the batteries produce more CO2 then than the gas to run the same distance?
2007-02-27 08:41:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by uisignorant 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why Bush , he is not stil king of the world.
All countries of 3th part of world like african,arabian countried also India are guilty for global warming too.
2007-02-27 08:48:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Enough? hehe, he ain't doing nothing.
USA is not even in the Kyoto world wild project
2007-02-27 09:06:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by danrouthier 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since no one actually knows if anything man can do will have any infuence at all upon the global climate, I'd say he's doing plenty.
2007-02-27 08:37:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by thegubmint 7
·
2⤊
2⤋