Who have you seen consistently positive and helpful answers from?

Question

There are certainly a lot of people who give knee-jerk responses, crack jokes about serious questions, or berate people with their opinions on a subject when their general opinion of it wasn't asked. There are also folks who seem to take the time to answer in a helpful manner, or don't answer when they've really got nothing to add.

Who are some folks that stand out as people you'd like answering your questions?

Answer 1

Me?

Seti's answers are consistent at least. I don't always agree, but they are at least rational.
Kunkee is pretty cool.
Quasimodo1957 is offensive sometimes, but deep down, I think he's usually right.
There are plenty that I think give consistently TERRIBLE answers. I'll refrain from naming them.
Don't forget Mr Johnson or John Doe or the latest incarnation who just says "do what u feel" and gives you the reference to the singles site.

Answer 2

I personally think I give really good answers. I never joke or give non-thoughful answers, but I sometimes give harsh wake-up call answers. A lot of folks come on here asking a question that they have already made up their mind about, or clearly are in total denial of reality.

Answer 3

Celticdragon
Miss M
Irish
sam c
Sean C
lite my fire
lookingforlove
mymom

are some of the people that give so nice answers

Answer 4

regrettably i imagine a wrestler's own blunders do no longer some thing to modify or result an opinion, as maximum have already got a unfavorable opinion of wrestling. All it does is provide them a clean reason to attempt placed down wrestling as a replace of fixing an opinion of wrestling. in case you look on the Chris Benoit saga, what number of human beings do you honestly imagine had there opinion replaced on wrestling as an entire by what Benoit did? i'd wager on no longer many, its only a clean element for them to say "i advised you so" at the same time as it contains wrestling. the final opinion of wrestling is unfavorable and absolutely everyone in touch is regarded down on, the blunders in simple terms provide human beings a clean and modern-day reason to look down on the followers and wrestling usually. Its no longer even in simple terms own blunders that some thing of the wide-spread public leap on wrestling for notwithstanding, human beings the position outraged that interior the approach the season Ben Roethlisberger would decrease himself to being on a wrestling tutor. it really is how wrestling is taken into consideration, there is little or no wrestling can do about this notwithstanding. The media in effortless words pay any interest to the wrestling international at the same time as they have some thing unfavorable to communicate about and look down on, if the media coated wrestling per week then the negatives would not be as undesirable. look at the different interest and they communicate about the reliable parts of the interest first then say on the darker area this got here about which makes the darker area look a lot less important compared to the reliable parts of the interest, with wrestling they in effortless words ever cover the undesirable so it grants to the unfavorable feeling in the route of wrestling the position as a steroids scandal in Baseball, for instance, the outcomes will be extra significant. it really is the adaptation and there is particularly little which will be performed about that, it would not count number that wrestlers are interior the ring 2 hundred-three hundred circumstances a year and nevertheless locate a great number of time to grant decrease back to followers. Its no longer because they pick to boost there public image notwithstanding because it would not, its because they pick to grant decrease back. they ought to get extra credit for what they do yet they could't substitute the very truth wrestling is in effortless words said at the same time as some thing unfavorable takes position.

Answer 5

I always give correct answers and I am on Dave's Top 10 list.

Answer 6

Constructive and helpful doesn't imply positive neccessarily. Sometimes positive is exactly the wrong tact to take when somebody is bent on self-destruction.

Answer 7

Greg ^

Answer 8

Quasimodo and Sad but True..................