English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-27 07:09:10 · 12 answers · asked by Bob M 1 in News & Events Current Events

Source: all over the world's newspapers

2007-02-28 01:17:33 · update #1

12 answers

That is most likely to be part of a smear campaign by groups who have policies against him.

2007-02-27 07:12:32 · answer #1 · answered by Narky 5 · 1 1

Well you were a little off on that utility bill. Inconvenient Al actually spends that amount per year, not per month. Still its a little more than the average Joe spends, the one Enviromental Al is always telling to cut down on their energy use.

2007-02-27 11:37:43 · answer #2 · answered by hironymus 7 · 0 0

oh it sounds like it very much.

if he is such an activast, than why not spend a little more money to help out the environment and use less energy?

DUH!!

2007-02-27 07:14:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If it's true, then yes. But the credibility of that statement depends on where you read it.

2007-02-27 07:13:54 · answer #4 · answered by Souris 5 · 1 0

yes and here is the source about his utilities


www.drudgereport.com

2007-02-27 07:39:11 · answer #5 · answered by charlesthesportsfan 2 · 0 0

no.. even if thats ture which it is very unlikely
what is the defniniton of ulties?
is it hte cost of him traveling all over the country?
also coejel light bulbs cost mro eas do energy effeicnent showers toilets and ovens and air conditioners........ therefore it is probably becuase he is so energy effeinct

2007-02-27 07:12:39 · answer #6 · answered by hanntastic 4 · 0 3

yes, he feels solar panels would spoil the scenery.

2007-02-27 12:43:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Source please. He probably doesn't do as he says we should do and that would too bad as it would really kill his integrity. Nevertheless his book and movie are no less relevant.

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=nation_world&id=5072659

2007-02-27 07:24:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If you read this in the NY Times...chances are that figure is grossly under-estimated.

2007-02-27 07:15:24 · answer #9 · answered by AmandaHugNKiss 4 · 2 2

YOU ARE FOR BELIEVING SUCH DRIBBLE.

2007-02-27 07:12:32 · answer #10 · answered by cork 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers