Or are they merely "daggers" in the liberal arsenal?
2007-02-27 05:57:10 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Interesting. And pretty much as I thought. It is evident that the folks throwing around these supposedly "derogatory" terms, don't have a clue as to what they are talking about.
I guess you heard something on Air America, MSNBC or CNN and simply made it yours.
Funny, isn't that what you accuse your "cons" and "neo-cons" of doing?
2007-02-27 07:01:45 · update #1
They are used by the mindless liberals that love to spout buzz words for reactions when they have nothing substantial to say!
2007-02-27 06:07:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its all people who spend to much time on the net They bandy about the con and neocon thing but it shows that they are not really educated as the basis of america is having two parties.
When you see "cons" it is a flag for those who just watch TV and make an opinion without the benefit of actually reading about history. People want to belong to something and it is easy to lean toward something, cults have preyed upon these people forever.
Liberals... anti Bush just because. What happens when a democrat get elected? What will they have to say then.
For the most part those casting on the net are 15 or those who are unable to grow up and process information about the real world. No offence to 15 year olds.
2007-02-27 14:12:05 · answer #2 · answered by jackson 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I know what they refer to...as in CONservative and NEO-CONservative. But I don't throw the term out there. Neo-con is actually a term I have heard being used by Bush's people. I am sure it can be used by liberals as a negative tag though.
2007-02-27 14:02:02 · answer #3 · answered by wolf n dolphin beals 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Pretty interesting little film about Neo-Cons here. I'm not saying its right or wrong, but I did the research and was able to find corroboration of most of the claims.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=eNaBztTkg6k
2007-02-27 14:11:18 · answer #4 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Given that you never attended university, you would be clueless about it yourself, about which university it started at.
The "professorships" of the clowns at the U of Chicago should be tenuous, not tenured. They should perish instead of publish.
.
2007-02-27 14:04:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
They say a "con" is a criminal and a neo con is a Zionist criminal!
2007-02-27 13:59:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes
No
Next?
2007-02-27 13:59:55 · answer #7 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
conservatives and new conservatives.
2007-02-27 14:00:23 · answer #8 · answered by vibrance0404 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋