personally i want to see these matches:
lesnar vs lashley
lesnar vs umaga
2007-02-27 05:27:36 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
without
2007-02-27 05:41:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If I never see Brock Lesnar wrestle again, my life wouldn't change. The guy was a great wrestler in college, but that obviously didn't translate into professional wrestling. No mic skills, all he did was punch people a few times, throw them around, and do an F-5.
And for those matches you listed, I see them going as well as the Lesnar vs. Goldberg match at WMXX.
2007-02-27 14:32:15 · answer #2 · answered by kid_of_seph 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are better without him. The WWE doesn't need stars that will use the company as a stepping stone without putting in some years.
2007-02-27 14:07:34 · answer #3 · answered by Arnold 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE is better without Lesnar. Lesnar was an overpushed Jobber who couldn't put asses in seats. It also didn't help that he consistently botched moves & hurt opponents.
2007-02-27 13:46:49 · answer #4 · answered by Tom L 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
theyre better with him. He was great.
I would like to see another Lesnar vs Taker feud
or
Lesnar vs Batista feud
2007-02-27 20:32:23 · answer #5 · answered by TheMainEvent 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the wwe would be better with brock lesnar. good luck.
2007-02-27 13:31:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
definetly, wwe is definetly better with lesnar because lesnar is an animal. more of an animal then batista.
2007-02-27 13:45:04 · answer #7 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE sucks.
2007-02-27 13:35:03 · answer #8 · answered by b c 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
IT'S BETTER WITHOUT HIM. REMEMBER, HE LEFT RAW BECAUSE HE WAS GOING TO HAVE TO WRESTLE TRIPLE H. HE KNEW THAT TITLE WAS ABOUT TO LEAVE HIS WAIST.
2007-02-27 13:54:42 · answer #9 · answered by Arthur T 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
without!
2007-02-27 18:53:44 · answer #10 · answered by Sandy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋