trends in politics?

Question

one trend that i see is that everything in politics has been reduced down to liberal or conservative. i think when that happens we (as in the whole population) miss how complex our policies really are. we cant effectivly solve problems based only on liberal or conservative view points.
its like when you see the news ,when you agree then its fact,when you disagree its biased.
this may be an example,
how can a party be pro life but support the death penalty?
do you think that we should stop and rethink our politics of only being conservative or liberal??? ive never seen our country so devided... united we stand is our slogan??? are you kidding me

Answer 1

Excellent observation about the conservative's life/death stance.

Any country that grants it's citizens civil rights is going to be divided, possibly to a fault. The question is whether you think that is going to be stronger in the view of history than a state like China where everyone is afraid to say things and single party orthodoxies are worshipped. I think that a free society is stronger, but only the future will answer that question.

What is clear though, is that the two party system does not represent most of the people in the country, which is itself a travesty. When the U.S. rewrote the Japanese and the German constitutions, being careful to prevent any single party from taking over, they made sure to preclude two party systems by creating a parliamentary system.

The idea is to get people voting about ideas and not personality. Voting about personality is a trait of fascism, which has obvious dangers. Personality is too tricky. 300 million people can't watch tv and gauge the true character of one person, but 300 million people could read an idea and give a rational vote over whether it's good or not.

Let anyone take an idea and turn it into a party platform, then as that idea becomes accepted or rejected, the representation of that idea in government grows proportionately. As we have it now, we vote for people and then who knows what ideas we are going to get. The difference between two sides can become quite negligible.

Candidates pretty much refuse to talk about ideas now, for instance, Hillary Clinton. She's just a personality, a gender, a face. She stands for nothing. Same for Barack Obama(doesn't have to be) and John McCain(didn't used to be). The people who stand for ideas, John Edwards, Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich look like circus clowns, but they are the ones really thinking about the future of the country and not their own egos.

Until we make our politics a politics of ideas we are going to have to deal with these two ill-defined argumentative sides, chasing each other in circles while the country goes to hell.

Personally, I think it would be worth a revolution to do this.

Answer 2

Politics in America has always been dominated by a 2 party system, an if this or that decision. This is not a new trend. Some problems need a partially conservative, partially liberal solution. I find that over time as parties in power shift these solutions can come about when the respective party implements their part of the solution, unfortunately this can take years.

how can a party be pro life but support the death penalty?

Why should a baby receive a death sentence because the mother can't / doesn't want to take care of it? Should a murderer receive the death penalty? I think it's pretty clear here.... In one case, it's another's fault that murder has to be committed, in the other case the murderer made a conscious decision that resulted in them receiving the death penalty.

Answer 3

I agree. There's nothing good that comes from picking one side.

I rest somewhere in the middle. Maybe a bit to the right, but I do like some left ideas.

How can a party be pro life but support the death penalty? By dehumanizing the criminal. They feel that while the liberals think the unborn are essentially cattle, the conservative thinks that the unborn are precious life and that criminals are cattle.

The Dems took the middle this time around, and that's why they won the congress. If nothing changes don't be surprised to see the GOP make a comeback in 08 or 10.

Answer 4

Because there is only one party in the U.S. It has a liberal and a conservative wing. When the liberal wing is in power, the conservative wing moves toward the center. When the conservative wing wins, the liberal wing moves to the center.

Most other countries, at least theoretically, move to the opposite side of the party in power. If a conservative party is in power, the liberals move to the left. If a liberal party is in power, the conservatives move to the right. Both types of parties can do this because they are NOT in power.

However, terms like 'conservative' and 'liberal' are relative. To see how conservative the U.S. is in comparison to the rest of the world read John Micklethwait's & Adrian Wooldridge's book, "Right Nation." It's written by two reporters who are not American, but have spent many years in the U.S. It's a real eye-opener.

Answer 5

It relies upon while you're taking a international politics path or an American Politics path. no count if it fairly is international, it fairly is fairly useful to think of of another issues, such because of the fact the introduction of the UN or ecu Union, alongside with ethnic cleansings in Darfur and Kosovo. perhaps the emergence of China would desire to be an argument. You look questioning extra a protracted the lines of particular activities, i'd circulate broader. The chilly conflict (including the Cuban Missile disaster) Terrorism (including 9/11) The emergence of China as a international potential the internet is invented (the international became smaller) i would not incorporate the conservative upward push except it fairly is basically approximately American politics. Then, regrettably, you're able to.

Answer 6

I see the dems getting even more centrist and the GOP getting more conservative. Thusly the dems will be on a winning streak for several cycles. After that, I see America becoming more liberal again. It all goes in cycles and always has