In Saudi Arabia it is against the law to have a holy bible and is punishible by death. North Korea also does not allow religious freedom. Most islamic nations do not allow christians to practice in public.
2007-02-27 03:57:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by russell s 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, the True answer is no place. Christians are not, nor have ever been forced to meet. It is a choice to meet, then it becomes a Religion and is no longer Belief in an Almighty Being but becomes twisted into some political or financial warped sense of understanding.
I would think that most Christians agree that Jesus the Christ is the Emanuel, or Prophet of God, Son of same, that dude went to a worship house and cursed them. He said a bad word, but he was Christ, so it's kewl.
Christians do not have to meet with others of the same belief or ideals, they choose to. Jesus did say where 2 or 3 of you are gathered in the presence of my daddy, God, then what you agree on is okee dokee.
The good person does not seek to satisfy themselves with vain notions or concepts, they help other humans. To do this does not require a secret or even an open meeting.
2007-02-27 03:58:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
China - restricts religious freedom. practice is allowed in institutions that do not threaten the govt. but actions seen as rebelling or threatening against govt authority are suppressed.
Jerusalem - forbids Jews who have converted to Christianity from proselytizing to other Jews. I had a friend who went there, to do this in private, but could not be found out publicly or she would be in trouble with authorities.
Certain Muslim nations -- Example in Afghanistan, Abdul Rahman, the man who ended up with a death sentence for converting from Islam to Christianity. So many protests came from the West, that the authorities let him go.
So he was quickly removed to another country.
U.S./Christ Identity - Because of U.S. laws, certain denominations claiming Christian affiliation are restricted in their activities.
* Denominations such as the Klan and White Supremacists may interact in private or over the net, but are closely guarded (recent case against such a group resulted in $6 million damage judgment)
* A Klan chapter that recently met in Tomball Texas drew a lawsuit against the city demanding corrections preventing groups from meeting at city facilities that discriminate against equal participation by all members of the public. so this would force the meetings in private only, given the beliefs that exclude other races or race mixing.
Note: the ACLU is often ridiculed for defending constitutional rights of Klans members in conflicts regarding their equal right to assemble, protest, march, etc in public.
2007-02-27 03:33:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nghiem E 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
North Korea.
2007-02-27 03:36:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by True Patriot 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
china and it was on the news about 2 months ago.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/rt_china.htm
i searched the net for this address it may give u the answer u need. i found it quite disturbin when i saw the report on the news about china and the secret meetings and how they get persecuted for their beliefs.
2007-03-02 22:44:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
saudi arabia. islam is the only religion allowed under their laws.
2007-02-27 03:36:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ashkat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋